IADR Abstract Archives

Post-Surgical Complications and Their Detrimental Effects on Bone Gain in Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) utilises a barrier membrane to allow osteogenic cells to populate a space by excluding epithelial and connective tissue cells. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the incidence of complications after vertical GBR, and the influence of the timing of implant placement and regenerative device on complications. A further aim was to compare the difference in bone gain between sites with and without membrane exposure, and with and without infection occurrence.
Methods: MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched in duplicate up to, and including, November 2020. Only randomised controlled clinical trials were selected. Outcomes included patient-level and site-level incidence of minor and major complications that occurred after vertical GBR. Random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed where appropriate. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021226432).
Results: Nine randomised controlled trials were selected for the primary qualitative and quantitative analyses. The overall patient-level incidence including both major and minor complications was 16.4% [95% CI = 4.5, 32.1]. Patient-level incidence of minor and major complications was 12.8% [95% CI = 3.0, 26.4] and 1.6% [95% CI = 0.0, 7.0]. Site-level incidence of minor complications due to wound dehiscence and infections was 8.9% [95% CI = 1.2, 20.5] and 1.4% [95% CI = 0.0, 6.2]. The type of regenerative device used, staged or simultaneous GBR, had no influence on post-surgical complications. Secondary analyses showed that membrane exposure and infection occurrence results in a significant decrease in bone gain with a ratio of means (RoM) of 0.61 [95% CI = 0.44, 0.84) and 0.56 [95% CI = 0.40, 0.78] respectively.
Conclusions: Post-surgical complications are relatively common surgical complications after vertical GBR. There is a significant reduction in bone gain when post-surgical complications occur.

2021 South East Asian Division Meeting (Hong Kong)
Hong Kong
2021
041
Periodontal Research-Therapy
  • Tay, John  ( National Dental Centre Singapore , Singapore , Singapore )
  • Ng, Ethan  ( National Dental Centre Singapore , Singapore , Singapore )
  • Lu, Jacinta  ( National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore )
  • Lai, Clement  ( National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore )
  • None.
    Poster Session
    Oral health research III
    Wednesday, 12/08/2021 , 12:00PM - 01:00PM
    Features of included studies
    Author/
    Year/Location
    Study design and subject sizeMean age ± S.D. (Range)Smoking status
    (%)
    Periodontal status
    (%)
    Test
    (No. of subjects, augmented sites, intervention)
    Control
    (No. of subjects, augmented sites, intervention)
    Method of harvesting autogenous bone (if applicable)Staged/ Simult-aneous GBRVertical bone gained after surgery Mean ± S.D. (Range) Method of assessing vertical bone gainedSize of vertical defect at baseline Mean ± S.D. (Range)Method of assessing size of vertical defectSpecifications of complicationsAppropriateness of site-level and patient-level reporting on complications Single or multiple augmented/donor site(s) per subject?
    Abrahamsson et al. 2012
    University
    RCT (n=20)T: 27 (range 18-55)
    C: 25 (range 18-49 years)
    4 smokers (20%)
    16 non-smokers (80%)

    T: 3 smokers

    C: 1 smoker
    NR10 subjects (10 sites): Soft tissue expander + pABG + Ti mesh + non-cross-linked rCM10 subjects (10 sites): Ramus bone blockT: Bone scraper from a second surgical donor site (ramus)

    C: Bone block from ramus
    StagedAt time of bone grafting
    T: 4.1±1.7mm (range 3-8mm)

    C: 2.9±0.9mm (range 2-4mm)


    At re-entry:
    T: 3.0±1.4mm (range 0-5mm)

    C: 1.6±0.8mm (range 0-3mm)
    Periodontal probe to measure the distance from titanium mesh to alveolar crest, using mesh as a fixed reference pointNRN.A.T:
    2 patients (1 site each) had minor perforation during the soft tissue expanding phase

    No infection or paraesthesia after bone grafting
    2 patients (1 site each) with Ti mesh exposure after a few weeks
    Treated with topical CHX gel 2x/day

    C: None of the bone blocks were exposed
    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Single augmented site; Single donor site
    Chiapasco et al. 2004
    University
    RCT (n=21)39.8 (range 18-59)Excluded smokers who smoked >15 cig/dayExcluded patients with active periodontal disease11 subjects (11 sites): pABG + Ti-reinforced ePTFE membrane Tenting screws placed for staged cases10 subjects (10 sites): Distraction osteogenesisBone blocks from ramus (9 patients) or ramus+ chin (2 patients) and particulated with bone millSimultaneous (6 subjects); staged (5 subjects)At time of bone grafting:
    4.78±1.25mm
    Transparent millimetre ruler to measure distance from top of implant head or tenting screw to most coronal level of direct bone-to-implant contact at mesial and distal of each implantNRN.A.1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure at 4w
    Suppuration even after oral antibiotics, local antiseptics (0.2% CHX 3 times/day + topical CHX gel), therefore membrane removed

    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure and suppuration at 10w
    Membrane immediately removed

    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure at 8w
    Treated with topical CHX gel for 5mo until membrane removal

    2 patents who underwent chin bone block harvest reported paraethesia of lower lip that resolved after 1 and 4 weeks respectively.
    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Single augmented site; Multiple donor sites
    Cucchi et al. 2017
    University

    RCT (n=40)5229 non-smokers (72.5%)
    11 smokers (<10 cig/day) (27.5%)

    23 no periodontal disease (57.5%)
    12 chronic periodontitis (30%)
    5 aggressive periodontitis (12.5%)
    All periodontitis patients treated with periodontal therapy prior to surgery

    20 subjects (20 sites): pABG + pFDBA + Ti-reinforced dPTFE membrane
    20 subjects (20 sites): pABG + pFDBA + Ti-mesh + cross-linked rCMBone scraper within the same surgical siteSimultaneousAt re-entry:
    T: 4.2±1.0mm
    C: 4.1±1.0mm
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from implant shoulder to first visible bone-implant contact at mesial, distal buccal and lingual sites around each implant T: 3.8±0.7mm
    C: 4.0±0.8mm
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from implant shoulder to first visible bone-implant contact at mesial, distal buccal and lingual sites around each implantT:
    1 patient (1 site) abscess at 0-1mo: implants, graft, membrane completely removed
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure with infection at 1-3mo: implants, graft, membrane completely removed
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure without infection at 3-6mo
    1 patient reported paraesthesia of the mental nerve with resolution of symptoms during the first mo of surgery

    C:
    1 patient (1 site) abscess at 0-1mo: implants, graft, membrane completely removed
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure with infection at 0-1mo: implants, graft, membrane completely removed
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure with infection at 1-3mo: only Ti mesh removed
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure without infection at 3-6mo
    3 patients reported temporary paraesthesia of the mental nerve with resolution of symptoms during the first mo of surgery
    No (no information whether paraesthesia occurred in the same patients that experienced membrane exposure)Single augmented site
    Fontana et al. 2008
    University

    RCT (n=5, split-mouth design)55 (range 47-66)Excluded smokers who smoked >10 cig/day
    Excluded patients with FMPS and FMBS>25%; no active periodontal disease 5 subjects (5 sites): pABG + tenting screws + Ti-ePTFE membrane5 subjects (5 sites): pDFDBA + tenting screws+ Ti-ePTFE membraneTrephined from retromolar area and particulated with bone mill (same surgical site)
    StagedAt re-entry:
    T: 5.15±0.34mm (range 4.75-5.50mm)

    C: 4.90±0.93mm (range 3.25-5.50mm)
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from top of tenting screw head to first visible bone-screw contact at mesial and distal sites around each screwT: 4.70±0.48mm (range 4.00-5.25mm)

    C: 4.10±0.8mm (range 3.00-5.25mm)
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from top of tenting screw head to first visible bone-screw contact at mesial and distal sites around each screwT:
    1 patient reported paraesthesia with resolution of symptoms within 2mo

    C:
    1 patient (1 site) abscess without membrane exposure at 2mo
    Membrane and infected tissue removed
    1 patient reported paraesthesia with resolution of symptoms within 1mo

    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Single augmented site
    Leong et al. 2015
    University

    RCT (n=16)59.4±7.5 (range 44-71)Excluded all smokersExcluded patients with poor oral hygiene, periodontal status unknown? subjects (9 sites): Block SDBA + tenting screws + non-cross-linked rCM ? subjects (10 sites): pSDBA + tenting screws + non-cross-linnked rCMN.A.StagedAt time of bone grafting:
    T: 4.0mm
    C: 4.0mm

    At re-entry:
    T: 1.78mm (range 0.0-5.0mm)

    C: 1.0mm (range -1.0-3.0mm)

    Periodontal probe to measure bone height difference after augmentation with a customised stentRidge deficiency of 4-6mmNRT:
    7 sites with wound dehiscence, resulting in one site with total graft failure

    C:
    3 sites with wound dehiscence

    No (no mention of how many site-level complications occurred per patient)NR for augmented sites
    Merli et al. 2020
    Private practice
    RCT (n=30)T: 51.6±14.0 (range 29-77)

    C: 57.9±13.6 (range 21-74)
    3 smokers (≤20 cig/day) (10%)
    17 non-smokers (90%)
    NR15 subjects (15 sites): pABG + non-cross-linked rCM + osteosynthesis plates (Fence technique)15 subjects (15 sites): pABG + pDBBM + non-cross-linked rCM + osteosynthesis plates (Fence technique)Harvested from intra-oral sites preferably from corpus-ramus of the mandible and particulated with a bone millStagedAt re-entry:
    T: 2.2±1.4mm
    C: 3.7±1.9mm
    Linear vertical distance between the greatest difference, in the superimposed CBCT scans at pre-grafting and re-entry, in the area with gain of bone after graftingNRN.A.T:
    2 patients (1 site each) with osteosynthesis plate exposure at 1 and 2mo respectively
    Treated with topical CHX gel 3x/day for 4mo

    C:
    1 patient reported hypoesthesia with resolution of symptoms at 2mo
    Treated with α-lipoic acid and Vitamin B complex
    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Single augmented site; NR for donor sites
    Merli et al. 2007
    Private practice
    RCT (n=22)T: 44.6 (range 29-59)

    C: 49.9 (range 36-69)
    4 smokers (18.2%)
    18 non-smokers (81.8%)

    T: 2 smokers

    C: 2 smokers
    NR11 subjects (11 sites): pABG + non-cross-linked rCM + osteosynthesis plates (Fence technique)11 subjects (11 sites): pABG + Ti-reinforced ePTFE membraneCaptured by filter trap from implant osteotomies and from various intraoral locations SimultaneousAt re-entry:
    T: 2.16±1.51mm
    C: 2.48±1.13mm
    Average of maximum and minimum defect height, using the top of the implant-abutment junction as a reference point. Measurements photographed with periodontal probe in situ to identify reference pointsT: 2.93±0.86mm
    C: 2.73±0.79mm
    Average of maximum and minimum defect height, using the top of the implant-abutment junction as a reference point. Measurements photographed with periodontal probe in situ to identify reference points T:
    2 patients (1 site each) with abscess
    Bone graft and barrier membrane completely removed, treated with systemic antibiotics
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure without infection
    Treated with topical application of CHX gel
    1 patient (1 site) with abscess at 1w due to not taking the prescribed antibiotics
    Treated with antibiotics successfully

    C:
    1 patient (1 site) with membrane exposure with infection
    Bone graft and barrier membrane completely removed, treated with systemic antibiotics
    1 patient (1 site) with fistula at 2w, resolved with systemic antibiotics
    1 patient (1 site) with fistula at 5mo, resolved with oral hygiene measures
    1 patient (1 site) with fistula at 2mo, treated with removal of barrier membrane and systemic antibiotics
    1 patient (1 site) with lymph node swelling at 1mo, treated with systemic antibiotics
    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Single augmented site; NR for donor sites
    Rokn et al. 2018
    University
    RCT (n=11, split-mouth design)50.3NRExcluded patients with untreated periodontal disease11 subjects (11 sites): Ultrashort (4mm) implants11 subjects (11 sites): pABG + pDFDBA + tenting screws + non-cross-linked rCM Rotary bone harvester from external oblique ridge within the same surgical siteStagedAt re-entry:
    2.2±1.1mm
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from tenting screw head to cementoenamel junction of adjacent tooth (reference point) NR
    Baseline height was 8.1 mm (SD0.9)
    N.A.C:
    5 patients (1 site each) with membrane exposure
    Treated with topical CHX

    Out of these 5 patients, 3 reported paraesthesia with resolution of symptoms at 2w
    Yes (three augmented sites experienced two different complications; two augmented sites experienced one complication)Single augmented site
    Ronda et al. 2014
    Private practice
    RCT (n=23)49.6±11.6 (range 30-78)8 smokers (<10 cig/day) (34.8%)
    15 non-smokers (65.2%)
    Excluded patients with untreated or uncontrolled periodontal disease12 subjects (13 sites): pABG + pSDBA + Ti-reinforced dPTFE membrane11 subjects (13 sites): pABG + pSDBA + Ti-reinforced ePTFE membraneBone scraper within the same surgical siteSimultaneousAt re-entry:
    T: 5.49±1.58mm

    C: 4.91±1.78mm
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from implant shoulder to first visible bone-implant contact on mesial and distal sites around each implantT: 4.70±1.69mm

    C: 4.10±1.86mm
    Periodontal probe to measure distance from implant shoulder to first visible bone-implant contact on mesial and distal sites around each implant3 patients reported paraesthesia with resolution of symptoms 1-4w after surgery
    No membrane exposures and/or infections
    Yes (one augmented site complication occurred per patient)Multiple augmented sites
    C, control; CBCT, cone beam computed tomography; CHX, chlorhexidine; cig, cigarettes; CT, computerised tomography; dPTFE, dense polytetrafluoroethylene; ePTFE, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene; FMPS, full mouth plaque score; FMBS, full mouth bleeding score; GBR, guided bone regeneration; mo, months; N.A., not applicable; NR, not reported; no., number; pABG, particulate autogenous bone graft; pDBBM, particulate deproteinised bovine bone mineral; pDFDBA, particulate demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft; pFDBA, particulate mineralised freeze-dried bone allograft; pSDBA, particulate solvent dehydrated bone allograft; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; rCM, resorbable collagen membrane; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SDBA, solvent dehydrated bone allograft; T, test; Ti, titanium; y, years