IADR Abstract Archives

Oral Health and Quality of Life in Andean Preschoolers

Objectives: The aim of the present work was to analyze the oral health status and its relationship with the quality of life of preschool children in an Andean and vulnerable community in Peru.
Methods: The observational, correlational, prospective and cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 120 children aged 3-5 years. A pilot study was carried out to calibrate, to analyze the reliability of measurements (ICC intra-examiner = 0.885 and ICC inter-examiner = 0.821) as well as to identify the degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.806) of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Early childhood caries (ECC) was determined using the dmft index. Malocclusions were considered to be: overjet greater than 3 millimeters, anterior open bite, anterior crossbite, bis to bis bite and anterior deep bite. The ECOHIS scores were summarized with measures of central tendency and dispersion. Oral factors and variables were analyzed univariate and bivariate using the Mann Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman correlation and linear regression analysis was performed to identify the factors and the extent to which they explained the ECOHIS score.
Results: Multiple linear regression analysis by least squares method only included as significant (p <0.05) the contribution of dmft to explain the ECOHIS score, leaving aside variables such as gender, age, malocclusion and simplified oral hygiene index. The estimated regression model was ECOHIS Scores = 11.67 + 0.79 * dmft, where ECOHIS scores increased by 0.79 for each unit gain of dmft, and the variability of the scores obtained is explained by the dmft in an R2 = 30% (p <0.001).
Conclusions: There is an impact of ECC on OHRQoL among Andean preschoolers in Peru, and their families.

2020 South East Asia Division Meeting (Virtual)

2020
S021
Cariology Research-Clinical & Epidemiological Studies
  • Huamán Mendoza, Aldrin  ( Univeristy of São Paulo , São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Pinedo, Karen  ( Federico Villarreal National University , Lima , Peru )
  • Valdez, Freddy  ( Cayetano Heredia University , Lima , Peru )
  • NONE
    Oral Session
    Oral 2
    Friday, 11/27/2020 , 01:00PM - 03:00PM
    Characteristics of children between 3 and 5 years old (n = 120)
    CHARACTERISTICn%95% CI Proportion
    GENDER 
    Male5848.30.390.57
    Female6251.70.430.61
    AGE 
    3 years4033.30.250.86
    4 years4033.30.250.86
    5 years4033.30.250.86
    SEVERITY OF DENTAL CARIES 
    Healthy43.30.0120.086
    Low severity3327.50.200.36
    High severity8369.20.600.77
    MALOCCLUSION 
    No5949.20.400.58
    Yes6150.80.420.60
    TYPE OF MALOCCLUSION 
    None5747.50.390.57
    Overjet >3mm10.80.0010.057
    Anterior open bite86.70.0330.13
    Anterior crossbite32.50.0080.075
    Bis to bis bite1815.00.0960.226
    Anterior deep bite3327.50.2010.362
    SIMPLIFIED ORAL HYGIENE INDEX 
    Good4537.50.290.47
    Regular7461.70.530.70
    Bad10.80.0010.058
    CI: Confidence interval
    ECOHIS responses of parents (N = 120)
    ImpactsNever or hardly everOccasionallyOften or very oftenDon’t know
    n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
    Child Impact 
    How often has your child... because of dental problems
    or dental treatments?
     
    Had pain in the teeth, mouth or jaws?63 (52.5)39 (32.5)18 (15.0)0 (0.0)
    Had difficulty drinking hot or cold beverages?87 (72.5)21 (17.5)11 (9.17)1(0.83)
    Had difficulty eating some foods?58 (48.3)49 (40.8)12 (10.0)1(0.83)
    Had difficulty pronouncing any words?87 (72.5)32 (26.7)1 (0.83)0 (0.0)
    Missed preschool, daycare or school?98 (81.7)20 (16.7)2 (1.7)0 (0.0)
    Had trouble sleeping?86 (71.7)30 (25.0)4 (3.3)0 (0.0)
    Been irritable?73 (60.8)41 (34.2)4 (3.3)2 (1.67)
    Avoided smiling or laughing?86 (71.7)28 (23.3)6 (5.0)0 (0.0)
    Avoided talking?92 (76.7)26 (21.7)2 (1.7)0 (0.0)
    Family impact 
    How often have you or another family member...
    because of your child’s dental problems or treatments?
     
    Been upset?21 (17.5)76 (63.3)23 (19.2)0 (0.0)
    Felt guilty?33 (27.5)67 (55.8)16 (13.3)4 (3.33)
    Taken time off from work?58 (48.3)56 (46.7)5 (4.2)1 (0.83)
    Had a financial impact on your family?91 (75.8)29 (24.2)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

    Relationship between the dmft index values and the sum of ECOHIS score
    ParametersnRho95% CI (Rho)p-valueEstimated regression modelR2 (p-value)
    Dmft (x)1500.580.47-0.70<0.001y = 11.67+0.79x0.304 (<0.001)
    ECOHIS Score (y)