IADR Abstract Archives

Immediate Implant Stability Compared to Delayed Implant Stability: A Systematic Review

Objectives: to compare ISQ follow-up value between immediate implants and delayed implants.
Methods: An electronic search on PubMed and Wiley Online Library was conducted to find articles published between March 2017 and March 2018 about ISQ value to determine immediate implant stability or delayed implant stability. Manual review and selection were performed on 67 initial articles, and resulting in only 5 articles that met the inclusion criteria
Results: The initial search of online database resulted in 67 articles. All the full-text articles were screened and selected based on inclusion criteria. There were 184 patients with 215 implant treatments in the remaining 5 articles. About 163 implants were immediate implants procedure and the remaining 52 implants were delayed implants procedure.
Conclusions: The ISQ value between immediate implants and delayed implants showed that the stability of the implants is mostly in medium stability groups for both types of implants procedures.
South East Asia Division Meeting
2018 South East Asia Division Meeting (Da Nang, Vietnam)
Da Nang, Vietnam
2018
0003
Implantology Research
  • Neormansyah, Ingrid  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
  • Adam, Andi  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
  • Oktawati, Sri  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
  • Gani, Asdar  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
  • Basir, Irmah  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
  • Admy, Sandy  ( Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hasanuddin , Makassar , South of Sulawesi , Indonesia )
    • NONE
    Poster Session
    Poster Session-IADR-SEA Unilever Hatton Divisional Award-Senior Category
    Thursday, 09/13/2018 , 11:15AM - 12:30PM
    Table 1. Description data from 5 included articles that reported about ISQ value
    Author
    (year)    		Subject/
    Implant    		Age
    (years)    		Type of implant
    (n)    		Baseline (ISQ)Follow-up (ISQ)Success rate
    Wychowanski et al
    (2017)    		97/11227–71Immediate (112)62.9 ± 0.667.2 ± 0.6
    (4 months)    		100%
    Khongkhunthian et al
    (2017)    		46/50-Delayed (50)
    - Conventional (25)
    - Short (25)    		75.05 ± 3.26 (conventional)
    73.86 ± 2.38 (short)    		72.37 ± 1.35
    (conventional/4 months)
    72.89 ± 1.87
    (short/4 months)    		91.30 %
    (conventional)
    95.65 %
    (short)
    Han et al
    (2017)    		30/4020–82Immediate (40)72.9 ± 5.976.2 ± 3.2
    (1 week)
    73.3 ± 2.0
    (2 weeks)
    71.7 ± 4.3
    (1 month)
    73.1 ± 3.4
    (2 months)
    74.4 ± 5.1
    (3 months)
    74.6±2.7
    (1 year)    		100%
    Dixon et al
    (2016)    		1/357Immediate (1)
    Delayed (2)    		-83 (immediate/12 months)
    72 – 75 (delayed/12 months)    		100%
    Qabbani et al
    (2016)    		10/1018–40Immediate (10)-78.4 ± 2.45
    (buccal/9 months)
    78.7 ± 3.23
    (lingual/9 months)
    78.6 ± 4.42
    (distal/9 months)
    78.6 ± 4.45
    (mesial/9 months)    		100%

    3002334_File000000.jpg
    3002334_File000000.jpg