Methods: This study was performed by a novice clinician on forty single-rooted extracted teeth. The teeth were randomly assigned into two groups (Group H and Group R) of 20 each once the working lengths were established. Group H was prepared with conventional K files employing the crown-down technique, while Group R was prepared with Hero Shaper 642® rotary files. Working time was noted to determine efficiency. Stereomicroscopic analysis and radiographic analysis was performed to evaluate canal taper and procedural errors.
Results: Working time was longer in Group H (17.9 minutes) when compared to Group R (8.6 minutes). Endodontic preparation by hand instrumentation revealed over-preparation of the canals, ledge formation and instrument fracture. Rotary instrumentation displayed conservative, tapered preparation with minor procedural errors.
Conclusions: Rotary instrumentation proved to be more efficient, less time consuming, easier to use with fewer procedural errors when compared to the hand instrumentation technique.