Methods: Caries-free wisdom teeth were set in epoxy-resin and sectioned through the pulp chamber by either cutting perpendicular to the crown, the buccal aspect or oblique sections. Specimens from each orientation were wet polished to 1, 2 or 3mm thickness (n=5; Silicon-carbide, P220 & P1200) to expose dentine on two opposing surfaces. The absolute irradiance of 9 ϕ5mm, epoxy encased LEDs (400-900nm) were measured using a calibrated fibre-based UV-Vis spectrometer (USB4000, Ocean Optics) through the dentine specimens and transmission percentage (LT) calculated. Statistically significant differences were identified by using multi-factorial analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey tests (p=0.05).
Results: LT was dependent on dentine orientation, LED wavelength and dentine thickness. The general-linear model of independent variables revealed significant differences (p<0.001) which were wavelength (df=8;F=653.44) > thickness (df=2;F=278.32) > orientation (df=2;F=117.12). LT at each wavelength was significantly higher for crown or oblique sections compared with those from the buccal aspect (p<0.05). LT was significantly increased (p<0.05) at 605nm and 660nm and significantly decreased at shorter and longer wavelengths (Table 1).
Table 1: LT percentage through dentine specimens. Standard deviations are presented in parentheses and significant differences from one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests within each thickness group is represented by superscripts.
Specimen/ λ |
400nm |
450nm |
500nm |
545nm |
605nm |
660nm |
710nm |
780nm |
810nm |
Crown 1mm |
20.2 (8.2)a |
21 (7.3)a |
26.2 (7.5)a |
43.5 (4.5)a |
58.9 (4.2)a |
58.5 (3)a |
55 (2.8)a |
49.8 (5.6)a |
48 (5)a |
Oblique 1mm |
16.9 (5.3)a |
15.5 (3.7)b |
23.1 (7.1)a |
34.9 (2.9)b |
42.2 (3.1)b |
48.4 (1.8)b |
42.7 (2.9)b |
40.2 (4)b |
38.2 (4.3)b |
Buccal 1mm |
16.2 (5.5)b |
13.8 (3.7)b |
19.4 (4.4)b |
30.8 (2.5)b |
40.7 (4.1)b |
39.8 (1)c |
36.3 (3)c |
33.4 (3.9)b |
31 (2.6)c |
|
|||||||||
Crown 2mm |
6.3 (5.9)a |
9.9 (4.2)a |
18 (3.5)a |
27.8 (2.2)a |
36 (1.8)a |
42.7 (1.3)a |
37 (0.8)a |
37.6 (1.5)a |
38 (1.6)a |
Oblique 2mm |
4.4 (4.3)b |
7.1 (2.9)b |
12.4 (1.8)b |
21.8 (1.8)b |
25.6 (4.8)b |
33.3 (3.3)b |
29.1 (1.8)b |
27.4 (1.7)b |
28.3 (2.6)b |
Buccal 2mm |
3.9 (12.8)b |
5.7 (5.1)c |
10 (5)c |
15 (5.6)c |
18.2 (6.2)c |
20.6 (4)c |
17.8 (5.3)c |
16.9 (5.5)c |
17.4 (5.8)c |
|
|||||||||
Crown 3mm |
1.7 (5.9)a |
3.3 (2.5)a |
9.8 (2.9)a |
14.8 (3.6)a |
21.9 (3.2)a |
29 (3.2)a |
26.2 (2.5)a |
25.5 (2.1)a |
28.9 (2.6)a |
Oblique 3mm |
1.3 (5)a |
2.7 (3.3)b |
6 (5.1)b |
10.8 (1.3)b |
8.3 (13.9)b |
17.7 (2)b |
15.5 (3.5)b |
16.1 (4.8)b |
16.6 (3.7)b |
Buccal 3mm |
1 (20.6)b |
2.5 (8.6)b |
5.2 (7.5)b |
7.6 (7.1)c |
3 (32)c |
12.5 (5.9)c |
10.1 (4.7)c |
9.6 (6.2)c |
11.8 (4.5)c |
Conclusion: Of the wavelengths tested here, an optimal window of increased light penetration was observed between 600-700nm and was dependent upon orientation and thickness of dentine. The wavelengths tested may have therapeutic significance for the photobiomodulatory therapies of pulp tissue and disinfection of contaminated dental lesions.