IADR Abstract Archives

Edge strength of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites

Objectives: To compare the edge strength of several bulk-fill materials with traditional resin-composites.

Methods: 3 disc-specimens were prepared (12mm x 2.5mm) of each of the following materials: X-tra base, Venus Bulk Fill, SureFil SDR, (bulk-fill composites), and GrandioSO, Venus Diamond and Spectrum TPH3 (conventional resin-composites). Specimens for each material were incubated for 24 hrs at 37 °C before testing. All specimens were tested at an edge distance of ) 0.5 mm using an edge strength measurement device (CK10, N Engineering Systems, Nottingham, UK) with a diamond Vickers indenter and the force-to-fracture was recorded. Failure modes were examined under the integral CK10microscope. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to detect statistical differences (P<0.01) in edge strength among the materials. 

Results: The force (N)-to-fracture at a distance of 0.5 mm from the edge was defined as the Edge Strength. Mean (SD) values of edge strength (N) ranged from 114.0 (7.1) for SDR to 157.8 (6.4) for GrandioSO. These values were significantly different (P<0.01). There was no difference between bulk-fill composites. Chipping was the predominant mode of failure for all materials.

Conclusions: GrandioSO showed the highest edge strength. Bulk-fill composites had comparable edge strength with conventional resin-composites.

Division: Pan European Region Meeting
Meeting: 2012 Pan European Region Meeting (Helisinki, Finland)
Location: Helisinki, Finland
Year: 2012
Final Presentation ID: 514
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Scientific Groups
Authors
  • Silikas, Nick  ( University of Manchester, Manchester, N/A, United Kingdom )
  • Zankuli, Muayed  ( University of Manchester, Manchester, N/A, United Kingdom )
  • Watts, David  ( University of Manchester, Manchester, N/A, United Kingdom )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    Dental Materials: Composites-Bulk-Filling and Shrinkage
    09/14/2012