Methods: Eighteen canine teeth of eight adolescent patients with different Angle classifications were selected. After extraction of first premolars retraction forces were applied to canine teeth at distal direction. For this purpose sentalloy closed coil springs with eyelets generating forces of 150 grams were used. The forces were verified by a calibrated force gauge. Gingival crevicular fluid was sampled from each mesial and distal site at baseline and 1, 24 hours, 7 and 30 days after force. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantitative detection of osteoprotegerin was used. Repeated measurement ANOVA was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Results: No statistically significant difference was detected at intra-group or inter-group data analysis for total amounts and concentrations of osteoprotegerin in gingival crevicular fluid.
Conclusion: These results suggest that osteoprotegerin in the gingival crevicular fluid does not appear to be the important determinant regulating the balanced alveolar bone resorption during the orthodontic tooth movement.