Objectives: High strength of modern provisional materials is important for extending the time for clinical application. It was the aim of this study to determine fracture resistance and fracture toughness of different provisional restorative materials including an experimental product.
Methods: In this in-vitro study fracture strength of three-unit bridges of provisional crown & bridge materials was determined. Identical alloy dyes (Biosil F, DeguDent, G) were fixed in resin at a distance of 10 mm simulating a posterior gap. An artificial periodontium was provided with polyether impression material (Impregum, 3M ESPE,
Results:
| | |||
| Materials | Fracture Force (24hrs H2O storage) | Fracture Force (14 days H2O storage + TCML) | |
| Luxatemp Fluorescence (DMG, G) | | | |
| Integrity Fluorescence (Dentsply, G) | | | |
| Structur Premium (Voco, G) | | | |
| Experimental Protemp (3M Espe, USA) | | | |
| Acrytemp ( | | | |
Conclusion: The tested materials loose about 11-19% of their fracture strength due to TCML. One material even failed completely during aging. Among the surviving materials experimental Protemp showed the highest fracture resistance after TCML as well as highest fracture toughness and may be therefore considered for long-term temporization.