IADR Abstract Archives
“Clinical outcomes of Immediately & Conventionally Loaded Dental Implants- A systematic review”
Objectives: The aim behind this systematic review was to assimilate the outcomes of “immediately” & “conventionally” loaded implants.
Methods: To do so a detailed electronic search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct & Research gate to identify pertinent articles published between 2000 to 2021. After detailed scrutiny, six studies met the preset eligibility criteria & hence were shortlisted for this project.
Results: As far as the results were concerned, no remarkable difference was seen between the success of “immediately” & “conventionally” loaded implant groups. There was no remarkable difference in marginal bone levels, masticatory efficiency, bleeding on probing, implant stability quotients, peri-implant soft tissue contours among both the groups provided that immediately loaded implants had significant primary stability
Conclusions: Thus in selected patients “immediate loading protocol” can successfully be practiced ensuring that adequate primary implant stability has been achieved.
Methods: To do so a detailed electronic search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct & Research gate to identify pertinent articles published between 2000 to 2021. After detailed scrutiny, six studies met the preset eligibility criteria & hence were shortlisted for this project.
Results: As far as the results were concerned, no remarkable difference was seen between the success of “immediately” & “conventionally” loaded implant groups. There was no remarkable difference in marginal bone levels, masticatory efficiency, bleeding on probing, implant stability quotients, peri-implant soft tissue contours among both the groups provided that immediately loaded implants had significant primary stability
Conclusions: Thus in selected patients “immediate loading protocol” can successfully be practiced ensuring that adequate primary implant stability has been achieved.