Methods: Our cases were selected from patients who need bilateral bitewing radiographs. We took the graphs with conventional technique in one side and the new technique in the other side of the same patient for all 70 patients. Then the acceptance of clinician and patient were assessed by scale from 0 to 20.Furthermore the image quality were evaluated based on their overlaps, film positioning and cone cut that were recorded separately.
Results: In this study the clinician acceptance of new technique was more than the conventional technique (17/33 v 16/44). In contrast the patient acceptance of new technique was less than the conventional technique (13/37 v16/59), while in the new technique the cone cut & overlap errors were significantly lower than the conventional technique(p≤0.001);and the correct film positioning was than conventional method(p=0.005).
Conclusions: New method was more new acceptance for clinician and made lower diagnostic error but it had the fewer patient acceptance.