Immediate Loading of Four Interforaminal Implants Supporting Cantilevered Fixed Detachable Restoration with Either Axial or Tilted Distal Inclination Opposing Maxillary Complete Denture: Two-Year Prospective Study.
Objectives: To assess the radiographic and clinical outcomes of immediately loaded 4 axial implants versus 2 axial anterior and 2 tilted posterior implants placed in the mandibular interforaminal area to support fixed detachable restorations. Methods: : Adopting 80% power of the study in calculating sample size, 32 edentulous participants were randomly allocated to 2 equal groups. The control group received 2 anterior axial and 2 distal tilted implants while the test group received 4 axial implants in the mandibular interforaminal area. On the same day of surgery conversion technique for immediate loading was accomplished. Three months later, all participants received a screw- retained metal resin cantilevered mandibular restoration. A follow-up protocol of 12, and 24 months was scheduled to evaluate marginal bone level changes, modified gingival index, modified plaque index, peri-implant probing depth, and clinical attachment level. Results: Implants were evaluated throughout 2 years. The clinical results revealed no statistically significant difference (P>.05) between the studied groups regarding the marginal bone level changes, modified gingival index, modified plaque index scores, peri-implant probing depth, and clinical attachment level over the follow-up period. Conclusions: Flapless guided surgery together with immediate loading of 4 implants, supporting a full-arch cantilevered screw-retained prosthesis in the edentulous mandible is a feasible treatment option, whether the distal implants are inclined or axially placed.
2022 Egyptian Section Meeting/Alexandria International Dental Congress (Alexandria, Egypt) Alexandria, Egypt
2022
Khamis, Mohammed
( Faculty of Dentistry , Alexandria University
, Alexandria
, Egypt
)
El Sharkawy, Ahlam
( faculty of dentistry, Alexandria University
, Alexandria
, Egypt
)
Abdelaziz, Raina
( Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
, Alexandria
, Egypt
)
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Poster Session
Abstracts Presented 2022 Egyptian Section Meeting/Alexandria International Dental Congress (Alexandria, Egypt)
Comparison between the two studied groups according to different parameters in overall
All-on-four Group (n = 16)
Axial Group (n = 16)
t
P
Bone level changes (mm) 12 months – Baseline evaluation
1.318 ±.04
1.291 ±.04
1.964
.059
Bone level changes (mm) 24 months – Baseline evaluation
1.320 ±.03
1.299 ±.05
1.461
.154
Modified gingival index (MGI) 12 months evaluation
1.763 ±.26
1.611 ±.39
1.302
.203
Modified gingival index (MGI) 24 months evaluation