Objectives: To observe the ultrastrcuture of PRF and compare with PRP through scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM), in order to find the morphological evidence to explain the concepts above.
Methods: Blood samples were taken from 6 healthy volunteers (4 males, 2 females), two samples from each person synchronously. PRP gel and PRF were prepared according to the protocols, then examined by SEM and TEM.
Results: Great differences of ultrastructure were found between PRP gel and PRF .
1. In PRP gel, no relationship was found between fibrin and platelet. Fibers were less and unsharpnessly, forming compact network. Platelet-rich areas dispersed, within which the platelets folded, extrusing massive parapodium.
2. In PRF, fibrin network was raritas and polyporus, similar to a natural clot. There is morphologic relationship between fibers and platelets. Platelets in the center of platelet crump had plenty of dark ¹ granulum inside.
Conclusions: PRF has better morphous than that of PRP. This can imply that PRF would progressively release cytokines during fibrin matrix remodeling thus it can prolong its action time.