The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of ceramic inlays.
Method:
Ninety six non-carious human molar teeth were used in this study. Standardized class I preparations were made in all teeth. Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 24 each ceramic systems (Finesse, IPS Empress Esthetics, IPS Empress e-Max, Zirkonzahn prettau). Then each group were further divided into 8 groups. 1) Control, 2) 50µm Al2O3, 3) etched with % 9 HF, 4) experimental hot etching 30 min, 5) Nd: YAG laser irradiation, 6) Nd:YAG laser+50µm Al2O3particle, 7) Nd:YAG laser+% 9 HF, 8) Nd:YAG laser+ experimental hot etching. Cementation procedures followed a standard protocol. After cementation procedures, specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. The teeth were sectioned both mesial-distally and buccal-lingually along their long axis into three 1.2X1.2 mm wide I-shaped sections. The specimens were then subjected to microtensile testing at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the maximum load at fracture was recorded. Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons tests were used to evaluate the results (p<.05). Fractured surfaces were examined with a stereomicroscope (X20) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive.
Result:
Airborne particle abrasion with 50µm Al2O3demonstrated higher bond strength for all ceramic groups. Etched with %9 HF acid showed higher bond strength for Finesse, IPS Empress Esthetics, IPS Empress e-Max. Experimental hot etching showed higher bond strength for Finesse. Nd: YAG laser irradiation demonstrated no significant difference between control groups.
Conclusion:
Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be asssumed that 50µm Al2O3, %9 HF acid demonstrated higher bond strength in all ceramic groups.