IADR Abstract Archives

Veneering Methods Affect Zirconia-Veneer Adhesion and Fracture Strength

Objective: This study evaluated the fracture resistance(FR), shear bond strength(SBS), flexural strength(FS) and finite element analysis(FEA) of zirconia veneered with different methods. 

Method: Zirconia frameworks [IPSe.maxZirCAD,IvoclarVivadent (I); In-CeramYZ,VITA (V)] were prepared (InLab-Sirona) as crowns, bars and discs (N=180,n=10) and veneered with one of the following methods: a)CAD-on(CD) (IPSe.maxCAD-lithium-disilicate; MarkII-feldspathic), b)Layering(L) (IPSe.maxCeram-Nano-fluorapatite; VM9-feldspathic), c)Pressing(P) (IPSe.maxZirPress-fluorapatite; PM9-feldspathic). For crowns (N=60) stainless steel dies (chamfer: 1mm) were scanned (InEos). Multilayering for CD and reduced design (1mm) for L and P were performed. Bars(1.5x5x25mm3) and discs(2.5x2.5mm2) were sectioned from zirconia blocks. Framework were veneered according to each manufacturer`s instructions. Crowns were cemented(RelyX) and specimens were stored in 100% humidity at 37°C for 24h. Mechanical tests were performed in a universal testing machine(0.5mm/min). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Tukey’s, Bonferroni-tests(α=0.05). In addition, fractography (SEM) and FEA (Simufact.forming v11.0) analyses were made.

Result: The lowest FR values(N±SD) were obtained in V-CD group (L:6102±1519,P:4117±1083,CD:1900±254)(p=0.00) followed by I-P group (P:2506±593,CD:4408±608,L:4322±462)(p=0.00). Mean values for I-CD, V-L and V-P were significantly higher than V-CD(p=0.00), I-L(p=0.02) and I-P(p=0.01) combinations. Mean SBS values(MPa±SD) for CD(49±6) were significantly higher in group I (L:27±5,P:29±7)(p=0.00) and CD(24±4) being significantly lower in V (L:35±6,P:32±6)(p<0.002). The differences between I-CD and V-CD and I-L and V-L were significant. Mean FS values(MPa±SD) of L(428±41) were significantly lower (CD:583±62,P:565±54)(p=0.00) than that of group I but it was not significant in V (CD:496±96,L:496±36,P:538±72)(p>0.05). The differences between I-CD and V-CD were significant while V-L had significantly higher values than I-L. SEM of FR revealed adhesive failures for V-CD and cohesive failures within ceramic for I-L. Cohesive failures within ceramic and zirconia were seen in I-CD, V-L and V-P. FEA verified the results.

Conclusion: Zirconia framework can best be veneered with CAD-on produced lithium-disilicate. Reduced zirconia frameworks with feldspathic ceramics can be recommended when layering or pressing veneering ceramics to reduce ceramic fracture.

Continental European Division Meeting
2013 Continental European Division Meeting (Florence, Italy)
Florence, Italy
2013
222
Scientific Groups
  • Kanat, Burcu  ( Ege Universitesi, Izmir, N/A, Turkey )
  • Dündar Çömlekoglu, Mine  ( Ege Universitesi, Izmir, N/A, Turkey )
  • Çömlekoglu, Erhan  ( Ege Universitesi, Izmir, N/A, Turkey )
  • Özcan, Mutlu  ( University of Zurich, Zurich, N/A, Switzerland )
  • Güngör, Mehmet Ali  ( Ege Universitesi, Izmir, N/A, Turkey )
  • Oral Session
    Prosthodontics I
    09/06/2013