IADR Abstract Archives

Curing of epoxy- and dimethacrylate-based composites using different polymerization lamps

Objectives: To compare efficacy of QTH and LED polymerization lamps in curing of low-shrinkage epoxy-based and dimethacrylate-based composite materials.

Methods: Seven QTH and LED polymerization lamps with narrow (LED 1) and broad (LED 2) emission spectra were used to polymerize ring epoxy-based Filtek Silorane (3M-ESPE, A3), dimethacrylate-based Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer, A2) and Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar-Vivadent, bleach XL) differing in photoinitiators used. The extent of curing was characterized by a Knoop hardness measured on top and bottom surfaces of a 2 mm layer, 15 minutes after polymerization. Light intensity and emission spectra were measured with Optometer P-9710 and AstraNet spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (polymerization lamp, composite material) and t-tests at p=0.05.

Results: In dimethacrylate-based composites the highest hardness values were found after a 20-second light-curing with QTH and LED 2 lamps. The hardness of a Silorane material was significantly higher when cured with LED 2 lamps and prevailed significantly over the hardness of both control materials.

Conclusions: In spite of a limited number of polymerization lamps tested it seemed that epoxy-based composite material polymerizing via ring-opening cationic mechanism can be adequately polymerized with QTH lamps or LED lamps with a broad emission spectrum, which seems to be a promising alternative to the universal QTH lamp types.

Supported by Ministry of Education Youth and Sports Grant No. 237601/2008.

 

Material

QTH

LED 1

LED 2

Heliolux DLX1

Megalux FC

DioPower

Translux PB

BluePhase C8

G-Light

BluePhase G2

Light intensity mW/cm2

654

1160

366

739.2

960

1113

1210

Charisma

Top

32.1(0.3)a

34.9(0.4)b

20.7(0.2)c

24.5(0.3)d

26.6(0.4)e

23.9(0.4)d

27.9(2.3)f

Bottom

26.2(0.3)a

27.6(0.3)b

18.7(0.4)c

23.3(0.3)d

23.8(0.5)d

22.9(0.4)d

28.5(2.4)b

Tetric EvoCeram

Top

31.9(2.4)a

40.2(2.9)b

23.6(1.9)c

28.7(2.5)d

23.9(1.2)c

38.2(5.0)b

34.6(3.1)b

Bottom

24.5(2.0)a

32.1(2.7)b

20.2(1.4)c

27.2(2.3)d

23.1(1.5)a

29.5(3.0)b

29.2(4.2)b

Filtek Silorane

Top

50.1(0.4)a

49.2(0.3)a

41.3(0.2)b

43.1(0.3)c

41.5(0.3)b

54.2(0.3)d

53.5(4.8)d

Bottom

40.1(0.2)a

42.3(0.2)b

40.1(0.3)a

37.5(0.2)c

37.2(0.3)c

45.7(0.2)d

49.3(3.1)e

   

     

 


Division: Continental European, Israeli, Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
Meeting: 2009 Continental European, Israeli, Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Munich, Germany)
Location: Munich Germany
Year: 2009
Final Presentation ID: 376
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Scientific Groups
Authors
  • Bradna, Pavel  ( Institute of Dental Research, 1.st Medical Faculty of Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, N/A, Czech Republic )
  • Fronek, Jan  ( 1.st Medical Faculty of Charles University, Prague 2, N/A, Czech Republic )
  • Comba, Lukas  ( Institute of Dental Research, 1.st Medical Faculty of Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, N/A, Czech Republic )
  • Housova, Devana  ( Institute of Dental Research, 1.st Medical Faculty of Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, N/A, Czech Republic )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Discussion Session
    Oral Poster Discussion III
    09/12/2009