IADR Abstract Archives

Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cements to Different Treated Indirect Composites

Objectives: To determine the microtensile bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a total-etch resin cement to indirect composite restorations following different surface treatments.

Methods: Composite overlays (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) were luted on flat dentin surfaces of extracted human third molars using the following self-adhesive resin cements: Maxcem Elite (KerrHawe), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) or G-Cem (GC). The total-etch resin cement RelyX ARC (3M ESPE) was used as the control group. Composite surfaces were ground with 500grit SiC paper and randomly assigned to three different surface treatments: no treatment (NOT), silane application (S) (RelyX Ceramic Primer, 3M ESPE) and silane followed by an adhesive (SA) (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, 3M ESPE). The bonded assemblies were stored in water (24h, 37 °C) and subsequently prepared for microtensile bond strength testing (µTBS). Beams of approximately 1 mm2 were tested in tension at 1 mm/min in a universal tester (Instron 4411). Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05).

Results: Mean µTBS values are shown in the table. Same letter indicates statistically similar µTBS values. A significant influence of the resin cement used was detected (p<0.001). Composite surface treatment did not affect mean bond strengths (p>0.05), although interactions between resin cement and surface treatment were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Resin cement

Surface treatment

µTBS

MPa (SD)

Pre-test failures (%)

RelyX ARC

NOT

24.8 (7.2) n=14 ab

0

S

17.4 (10.6) n=15 abcd

20

 

SA

27.1 (9.6) n=15 a

0

Maxcem  Elite

NOT

4.5 (8.0) n=48 f

60.8

S

2.7 (6.4) n=53 f

74.1

 

SA

0.0 (0.0) n=29 g

90.6

RelyX Unicem

NOT

15.3 (6.2) n=11 cde

0

S

10.4 (9.1) n=17 e

22.2

 

SA

10.6 (9.5) n=19 de

21.1

G-Cem

NOT

5.0 (6.5) n=23 f

43.3

 

S

14.6 (6.8) n=11 cde

0

 

SA

18.4 (9.2) n=15 bc

6.7

Conclusion: The self-adhesive resin cements tested resulted in lower bond strengths than the total-etch resin cement. Specimens luted with Maxcem Elite exhibited the lowest µTBS values and the highest percentage of pre-test failures regardless the surface treatment. The mean µTBS for RelyX Unicem was not affected by the composite surface treatment. The application of silane and silane plus adhesive significantly increased µTBS values of G-Cem specimens. Supported by URJC-CM-2008-BIO-3526.

 


Continental European, Israeli, Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
2009 Continental European, Israeli, Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Munich, Germany)
Munich Germany
2009
97
Scientific Groups
  • Ceballos, Laura  ( Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, N/A, Spain )
  • Fuentes, Mª Victoria  ( Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Madrid, N/A, Spain )
  • González-lópez, Santiago  ( University of Granada, Granada, N/A, Spain )
  • Poster Session
    Poster Session I
    09/10/2009