IADR Abstract Archives

Nanostructured Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Trigger Osteoinduction and Osteogenesis

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of nanostructure and macropore architecture on the intrinsic osteoinduction of a new family of biomimetic CaP materials in an ectopic site, and to correlate it with the osteogenic potential when implanted in bone.
Methods: Four types of implants resulted from combining two different architectures and nanostructures were compared: 1) Fine-Foams (FF) 2) Fine-robocasted (FR) 3) Coarse-Foams (CF) 4) Coarse-robocasted (CR). Intramuscular (epaxial muscles) and intraosseous (5 mm Ø monocortical femur defect) implantation was performed in beagle dog (n=6 per implant/ 2 time points). Newly formed bone was assessed by backscattered scanning electron microscopy and quantified through microscopic computed tomography as a % of the total implant volume for intramuscular samples and as a % of the total cortical bone defect volume for the intraosseous samples.
Results: In the intramuscular study, new ectopic lamellar bone formation was observed only in FF group (4/6 animals, % of bone volume = 2.06 ± 1.84) at 6 weeks and in FF (6/6 animals, 14.64 ± 6.15%) and CF (2/6 animals, 0.58 ± 1.32%) groups at 12 weeks. Table 1 show the osteogenesis obtained.
Conclusions: The in vivo performance of biomimetic CaP scaffolds with identical chemical composition (CDHA) was highly dependent on macropore geometry (Concave/Prismatic) and nanoscale surface topography (Needle/Plate-like crystals). A concave geometry of macropores combined with high SSA (needle-like crystals) stimulates the intrinsic osteoinduction, this resulting in an enhancement of the osteogenic potential when implanted in bone.
Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
2017 Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Vienna, Austria)
Vienna, Austria
2017
0126
Implantology Research
  • Barba, Albert  ( Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech , Barcelona , Spain ;  Veterinary School, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra , Spain )
  • Ginebra, Maria Pau  ( Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech , Barcelona , Spain )
  • Rappe, Katrin  ( Veterinary School, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra , Spain )
  • Diez-escudero, A  ( Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech , Barcelona , Spain )
  • Maazouz, Yassine  ( Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech , Barcelona , Spain )
  • Español, Montserrat  ( Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech , Barcelona , Spain )
  • Öhmann, Caroline  ( Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden )
  • Persson, Cecilia  ( Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden )
  • Franch, Jordi  ( Veterinary School, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra , Spain )
  • Manzanares-céspedes, Maria-cristina  ( University of Barcelona , Hospitalet , Barcelona , Spain )
  • Spanish Government, Project MAT2015-65601-R.
    NONE
    Poster Session
    Implantology Research: In Vivo and in Vitro Research
    Thursday, 09/21/2017 , 11:30AM - 12:30PM
    Table 1
    Implant Type6 weeks %12 weeks %
    FF23.64 ± 5.0454.92 ± 5.71
    CF12.95 ± 4.5838.06 ± 4.62
    FR10.85 ± 3.3829.12 ± 5.7
    CR9.15 ± 4.8439.86 ±12.18
    Percentage of bone volume