Effect of Polishing Systems on Gloss of Resin Composites
Objectives: To evaluate gloss of bulk-fill versus universal composites polished with four different polishing systems. Methods: One hundred and sixty disc-shaped resin composite specimens (10 mm in diameter, 2-mm thick, n=20) were made using of each of eight materials (Table). The specimens in each group were subdivided into four sub-groups (n=5) and polished with one of the following polishing systems: Enhance + PoGo, OneGloss, DiaComp Feather Lite, and Jiffy Points (Table). Gloss was measured using a small area gloss meter (Novo-Curve, Rhopoint Instruments,East Sussex, UK). Means and standard deviations were calculated. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Fisher’s PLSD intervals were calculated at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Statistically significant differences were recorded among polishing systems and composites (P <0.0001). Fisher’s PLSD interval for comparison among polishing systems and composite types was 3.4 and 2.4, respectively. The highest gloss values were obtained using Enhance+PoGo polishing system, while overall universals exhibited better polishability than bulk-fills (71 vs. 54 GU). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that Enhance+PoGo polishing system were the most effective, while higher gloss values were recorded for universal composites as compared to bulk-fills.
Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
2017 Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Vienna, Austria) Vienna, Austria
2017 0100 Dental Materials 7: Color and Appearance (Esthetics)
Ceyhan, Yonca
( The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
, Houston
, Texas
, United States
)
Pereira Sanchez, Natalie
( The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
, Houston
, Texas
, United States
)
Mistry, Nikita
( The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
, Houston
, Texas
, United States
)
Powers, John
( Dental Consultants, Inc.
, Ann Arbor
, Michigan
, United States
)
Paravina, Rade
( University of Texas at Houston
, Houston
, Texas
, United States
)
Means and standard deviations (in parentheses) for gloss measurements (gloss units, GU) using four different polishing systems are presented in the Table (Composite types: B=Bulk fill, U=Universal).