IADR Abstract Archives

Zygoma Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Patient After Bilateral Maxillectomy

Objectives: This article describes the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a severe intraoral defect resulting from a maxillectomy resection, using two zygoma implants connected by CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar (infrastructure framework) and a maxillary obturator prosthesis.
Methods: A 52-year-old male Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index (PDI) Class IV patient that had a history of a bilateral maxillectomy for resection of a squamous oral cell carcinoma of the hard palate was referred to our department for oral rehabilitation by Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University. Intraoral examination revealed two zygoma implants (Zygoma Fixture, NobelBiocare) that 1 on the right side and 1 contralaterally. Multiunit abutments were connected to the implant body and a transfer impression (Impregum Penta, 3M ESPE) over the implants was made. A free shape milled bar were designed without following a particular manufacturing shape and customized according to the the denture tooth arrangement and the soft tissues. Before the manufacturing of infrastructure framework, acrylate polymer blocks (Tizian Blank PMMA, Schütz Dental GmbH) were initially used for the fabrication of replica bar using CAD/CAM to control intraoral compatibility. Maxillary obturator prosthesis and mandibular complete denture was completed and placed in the oral cavity in 2014. Turkish version of the 14-item questionnaire1 was given to patient before (temporary obturator prosthesis) and after oral rehabilitation for self-completion to evaluate functional, esthetic, and psychologic satisfaction (Table 1). Each item was scored by a number, with the final score (range: 0-29).
Results: Following delivery of the prosthesis, the patient’s response was favorable in relation to esthetics, speech, swallowing and mastication while the patient’s oral and facial appearance improved. A significant decrease in the total questionnaire score between the temporary obturator prosthesis (score = 18) and the zygoma implant-supported definitive obturator prosthesis (score = 2), suggesting an improvement in the patients quality of life and self-esteem.
Conclusions: Zygoma implant-supported obturator prosthesis have excellent retention and stability, and there is no displacement of the denture during speech and mastication.
Division: Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
Meeting: 2015 Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Antalya, Turkey)
Location: Antalya, Turkey
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 0158
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Prosthodontics Research
Authors
  • Celakil, Tamer  ( Istanbul University , Istanbul , Turkey )
  • Ayvalioglu, Demet Cagil  ( Istanbul University , Istanbul , Turkey )
  • Sancakli, Erkan  ( Istanbul University , Istanbul , Turkey )
  • Atalay, Belir  ( Istanbul University , Istanbul , Turkey )
  • Kayhan, Kivanc Bektas  ( Istanbul University , Istanbul , Turkey )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Case reports: Prosthodontics
    Thursday, 10/15/2015 , 12:00PM - 01:00PM
    TABLES
    A 14-item questionnaire was given to the patient to evaluate functional, esthetic, and psychologic satisfaction
    Q1During the day, how many hours do you wear your obturator prosthesis?
    (0)Nearly 24 h (1)Nearly 12 h (2)Less than 8 h (3)Nearly not worn
    Q2Do you wear your obturator prosthesis for social occasions?
    (0)Yes (1)No
    Q3Do you wear your obturator prosthesis for eating?
    (0)Yes (1)No
    Q4How well are you able to chew your daily soft food?
    (0)No difficulty (1)Little difficulty (2)Great difficulty
    Q5Can you eat hard food?
    (0)Yes (1)No
    Q6Can you eat on the defect side comfortably?
    (0)Yes (1)No
    Q7How well are you able to swallow daily food?
    (0)No difficulty (1)Little difficulty (2)Great difficulty
    Q8How well is the oro-nasal separation during drinking and eating?
    (0)Very good (1)Fairly good (2)Fairly bad (3)Very bad
    Q9Can you speak comfortably with your obturator prosthesis without dislodgement?
    (0)Yes, for long period of time (1)Yes, for short period of time (2)No, I can
    Q10In your opinion, how stable is your obturator during speech?
    (0)Very good (1)Fairly good (2)Fairly bad (3)Very bad
    Q11How satisfied are you with your obturator prosthesis esthetics?
    (0)Very satisfied (1)Fairly satisfied (2)Fairly unsatisfied (3)Very unsatisfied
    Q12Do you perform oral hygiene care?
    (0)Regularly (1)Not often (2)Not at all
    Q13How much is the effect of your obturator prosthesis on your daily life?
    (0)Great effect (1)Moderate effect (2)Minor effect (3)No effect
    Q14By the help of your obturator prosthesis, do you feel that you are?
    (0)Normal person (1)Near normal (2)Abnormal

    IMAGES