IADR Abstract Archives

New Self-Etching Glass-Ceramic Primer: Innovative Alternative for Glass-Ceramic Conditioning

Objectives: The clinically recognized procedure to achieve a strong and durable bond to glass-ceramics involves HF-etching & silanization. Silanization is responsible for chemical bond formation, while HF-etching creates micromechanical interlocking. However, HF poses handling issues due to its toxicity and capacity to over-etch glass-ceramics, requiring the development of less toxic and aggressive alternatives. Although HF-substitutes have been already reported in the literature, HF-etching remains the gold-standard for glass-ceramic conditioning.

To overcome HF-etching drawbacks, a self-etching glass-ceramic primer (Monobond Etch&Prime/MBEP/Ivoclar-Vivadent), combining a HF-free etchant and silane-system, was developed. This new HF-free-system is able to etch & prime all commercial glass-ceramics in a single step and application-procedure.

This study investigates MBEP-etching & -bonding performances to commercial glass-ceramics using scanning-electron-microscopy (SEM) and tensile-bond-strength (TBS).
Methods: The following glass-ceramics were selected: lithium-disilicate & leucite (e.maxCAD & EmpressCAD/Ivoclar-Vivadent), lithium-metasilicate (Celtra/Dentsply), feldspar (MarkII/Vita).
Glass-ceramics were allocated into two groups regarding surface-treatment. Group 1 (HF/MBP) was used as reference: the surface was treated with hydrofluoric acid (HF/application-time according to ceramic-IFU/5%HF-gel/Ivoclar-Vivadent) followed by Monobond Plus (MBP for 60s/Ivoclar-Vivadent). Group 2 (MBEP) was treated with Monobond Etch&Prime (MBEP for 60s/Ivoclar-Vivadent). TBS was investigated with Multilink Automix and Variolink EstheticDC (MLAM & VE, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Two different aging-procedures were tested: 24h@37°C and 10’000 thermocycles (10kTC/5-55°C/30s). Morphology of etched surfaces was examined by SEM.
Results: For results see the table below.

MBEP- and HF/MBP-groups demonstrated comparable TBS-values to all tested glass-ceramics.
SEM revealed that MBEP generates a less pronounced etch-pattern than HF.
Conclusions: MBEP showed comparable bonding performances to the well-established-system HF/MBP. This new HF-free-system allows conditioning of all commercial glass-ceramics in a simple & safe application-procedure.
Division: Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting
Meeting: 2015 Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions Meeting (Antalya, Turkey)
Location: Antalya, Turkey
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 0577
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Adhesion - Bond Strength Testing and Mechanisms
Authors
  • Catel, Delphine  ( Ivoclar Vivadent AG , Schaan , Liechtenstein )
  • Koch, Stefan  ( Ivoclar Vivadent AG , Schaan , Liechtenstein )
  • Lanz, Christa  ( Ivoclar Vivadent AG , Schaan , Liechtenstein )
  • Bock, Thorsten  ( Ivoclar Vivadent AG , Schaan , Liechtenstein )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials: CAD-CAM blocks - ceramic bonding - composite inlay
    Saturday, 10/17/2015 , 12:00PM - 01:00PM
    TABLES
    TreatmentCementTBS/24h@37°C[MPa]
    e.maxCADEmpressCAD
    HF/MBPVE42.1±7.1a49.3±6.1b
    MBEP42.5±7.2a47.5±9.9b
    HF/MBPMLAM59.6±5.5a44.3±6.0b
    MBEP51.1±9.3a55.7±5.2b
    TreatmentCementTBS/10kTC/5-55°C[MPa]
    e.maxCADEmpressCADCeltraMarkII
    HF/MBPVE35.1±11.5c31.4±3.8d38.4±6.9e39.7±8.8f
    MBEP47.9±6.6c31.5±5.9d35.1±10.1e32.5±12.4f
    Same letter per column means statistically equivalence (p<0.05/ANOVA/Tukey-Post-Hoc-Test).