Materials and methods: We applied four previously validated conceptual models to a defined trauma population of 119 patients. 5 observers assessed the total number of cases against the gold standard which was a Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon. Inter and Intra observer variance was analysed and correlated to mechanism of injury. We observed the merits and pitfalls of each model and developed a new model ZS avoiding previously noted limitations.
Results: All four models demonstrated similar trends with respect to the severity of the injury. The mean score for each patient was 17 (SD 20.4 range 0-118). The ZS score had strong intra-class correlation with an inter observer score of 0.98 and intra observer score of 0.99 (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: The newly created ZS model appeared valid with respect to observer variance and performance. It does allow classification of the more complex injuries. Although the potential appears great further studies are required to analyse the impact of such system on operating time, patient mobidity. hospital instay, treatment costs