IADR Abstract Archives

Stain Control Efficacy and Tolerability of an Oral Hygiene Regimen

Objectives: To determine whether an Experimental toothpaste, toothbrush and post-brushing mouthrinse (TTM) regimen prevented tooth stain accumulation and promoted stain removal versus a conventional marketed toothpaste and toothbrush (TT) regimen, and to study the Experimental regimen’s oral tolerability.
Methods: This program involved a stain control study (1) and an oral soft tissue (OST) tolerability study (2): both were single-centre, examiner-blind, healthy-volunteer designs. Study 1 had a 4-week stain-induction phase, followed by a 6-week stain-reduction phase (3 cells, N=423). After dental prophylaxis, subjects were randomised to an Experimental TTM regimen (1 cell) or a Reference TT regimen (2 cells). The Experimental toothpaste and mouthrinse contained the stain-control agent, sodium tripolyphosphate, at 5% and 1.2% respectively. Subjects used their allocated treatment 2x/day for 4 weeks, rinsing with fresh tea 3x/day to encourage stain development. After 4 weeks, subjects’ stain levels were assessed using the modified Lobene stain index (intensity), and tea-rinsing stopped. Subjects using the Reference regimen were then divided: one cell continued as before, the other switched to the Experimental regimen. Stain was re-assessed after 6 weeks. In study 2, the Experimental regimen or a marketed whitening TTM regimen (2 cells, N=208) were used 2x/day for 28 days. An OST examination was completed at baseline, 7 and 28 days.
Results: In study 1, stain accumulation in the Experimental TTM group was 8.3% lower (p=0.0364) and stain reduction was 28.7% greater than the Reference TT group (p<0.0001). There were 11 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). In study 2, there were 4 TRAEs in the Experimental TTM group, and 20 in the Reference TTM group. In both studies, mild desquamation and ulceration were the most frequent TRAEs.
Conclusions: The Experimental toothbrushing-mouthrinsing regimen prevented stain accumulation and promoted stain removal, compared to conventional toothbrushing with toothpaste alone. The Experimental regimen was well-tolerated. Studies funded by GSK Consumer Healthcare.
Division: British Division Meeting
Meeting: 2015 British Division Meeting (Cardiff, United Kingdom)
Location: Cardiff, United Kingdom
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 188
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Oral Health Research
Authors
  • Creeth, Jonathan  ( GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare , Weybridge , United Kingdom )
  • Milleman, Kimberly  ( Salus Research , Fort Wayne , Indiana , United States )
  • Milleman, Jeffery  ( Salus Research , Fort Wayne , Indiana , United States )
  • Gordon, Jenny  ( GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare , Weybridge , United Kingdom )
  • Jain, Ritika  ( GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare , Weybridge , United Kingdom )
  • Butler, Andrew  ( GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare , Weybridge , United Kingdom )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: Authors Creeth, Gordon, Jain and Butler are employees of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, so have a significant financial interest and affiliation with an organization whose products or services would be discussed in the abstract submitted for present
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    Evaluation of interventions
    Wednesday, 09/16/2015 , 11:30AM - 01:00PM
    TABLES
    Assessment time:Treatment sequence
    0-4wks: Ref
    4-10wks: Ref
    0-4wks: Exp
    4-10wks: Ref
    0-4wks: Ref
    4-10wks: Exp
    Baseline0.744 (0.024)0.768 (0.029)0.754 (0.024)
    week 0000
    week 40.886 (0.024)0.852 (0.035)0.910 (0.030)
    week 100.616 (0.025)0.633 (0.033)0.549 (0.024)
    Modified Lobene stain index values (mean (standard error) of intensity measures) by treatment and assessment time. (Exp: Experimental TTM treatment; Ref = Reference TT treatment)