IADR Abstract Archives

Adhesive resistance to cutting of universal adhesives applied with different dentin treatments.

Objective: To analyze the values ??of adhesive resistance to the cut of universal adhesives applied with treatments of total etching, adamantine etching and self-conditioning. Methods: In 18 molars, cavities of maximum extension of 4 mm deep were carved. They were divided into groups according to the treatment of the dentin substrate:Total etching  Group 1: Monobond 7 self etching. Group 2: One coat 7 universal.Group 3: Universal single bond. , Adamantine etching Group 4: Monobond 7 self etching. Group 5: One coat 7 universal.Group 6: Universal single bond. Self-conditioning:  Group 7 Monobond 7 self etching. Group 8: One coat 7 universal.Group 9: Universal single bond.The application followed the manufacturer's instructions, they were sealed with an oblique incremental technique. They were cut to obtain 2 specimens of 2.60 mm wide by 2.60 mm high. A universal testing machine with a head speed of 0.5 mm per minute was used. The data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance of one and two ways.Results: The values ??in MPa (mean ± SD) were: Group 1: 7.06 ± 3.01. Group 2: 10.74 ± 4.36.Group 3: 8.20 ± 3.92.Group 4: 7.41 ± 2.23.Group 5: 6.84 ± 1.50.Group 6: 5.86 ± 2.10.Group 7: 5.83 ± 1.94.Group 8: 7.14 ± 2.37.Group 9: 8.06 ± 3.51. Regarding dentinal adhesives and treatments:One coat 7 universal + total etching reached the highest values ??with significant differences (p = 0.024). Monobond 7 self etching + enamel etching achieved the highest values ??(p = 0.384) without statistical significance (p = 0.299) and universal single bond as a self-conditioner recorded the highest values ??without statistical differences between the remaining treatments (p = 0.299). In general, total etching (8.61 ± 3.96) recorded significantly higher resistive values ??(p = 0.049) compared to the enamel etching technique (6.71 ± 1.98) and self-conditioning (6.91 ± 2.68). The different adhesives had no significant differences (p = 0.205).Conclusions: The total etching treatment method obtained the highest bond strength values. Universal adhesives showed adhesive values ??without significant differences between them.
Argentine Division Meeting
2019 Argentine Division Meeting (Santa Fe, Argentina)
Santa Fe
2019

Accepted Abstracts
  • Rozas, Carlos Alfredo  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Mirotti, Germán  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Lutri, Paola  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Kraemer, María Elin  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Monserrat, Natalia  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Piconi, Maria Celeste  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Caballero, Alicia  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • De León, Elisa  ( University of de Republic Uruguay, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Sezin, Mario  ( National University of Cordoba, Faculty of Dentistry )
  • Secyt-UNC Res. 411/18
    Oral and Poster Presentations