Methods: Bovine incisor enamel was cut mounted in acrylic resin and then enamel surface polished. Each specimen was covered with 0.1 mm thick plastic tape with 3mm diameter hole. The specimens were placed into a Carbopol and lactic acid demineralization solution (pH4.8, HAP 1mg/L) for 5 hours at 37o C. The hardness of the specimens was measured using a microhardness tester equipped with diamond Vickers indenter at 300-gf load for 10s. Demineralized enamels were covered with the corresponding GIC materials. The enamels surfaces were remineralized for 1 week in artificial saliva (pH=7) at 37oC. Covered GICs on enamels were then removed, and hardness of specimens were measured again.Mean surface microhardness for each treatment group was calculated and compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s method.
Results: The microhardness values of EP was significantly higher than those of RP and XT(p<0.01) after one week of remineralization.
Vickers Hardness Number |
|||
|
Fuji VII EP |
Riva Protect |
Vanish XT |
Baseline |
171.1(10.4)a |
170.8(20.6) a |
170.9(12.4) a |
Remineralization 1week |
210.2(10.8)b |
185.1(17.2) a |
176.8(12.7) a |
n=9, ():S.D.
Conclusions: Fuji VII EP may have more remineralization effect to the demineralized enamel lesions than Riva protect and Vanish XT.