Methods: Fourteen subjects with chronic TNP (mean duration: 9.7 years) and 14 age- and gender-matched asymptomatic subjects were recruited. An optoelectronic jaw tracking system (JAWS3D) recorded the movement of mandible in 6 degrees-of-freedom during free chewing. Subjects completed the Pain Catastrophising Scale at the recording session.
Results: TNP subjects did not report any pain either before, during, or after the experimental session. The velocity (TNP: 24.2±12.3 mm/s; control: 27.4±6.2 mm/s) and amplitude (TNP: 10.7±5.3 mm; control: 11.2±2.4 mm) of jaw movement during free chewing were not significantly (p>0.05) different between TNP and control groups. However, TNP subjects exhibited significantly greater variability in velocity (Levene's test for equality of variances, p = 0.009) and amplitude (Levene's test for equality of variances, p = 0.002) between individuals compared to controls. There was a significant negative correlation between pain catastrophizing scores and velocity (r=-0.56, p=0.004) and amplitude (r=-0.70, p=0.005) of movement among the TNP group.
Conclusions: The data suggest that, consistent with the IPAM, psychological factors may influence the association between pain and motor function.
Supported by NHMRC of Australia (512309) & Australian Dental Research Foundation, Inc