IADR Abstract Archives

Translucency Parameter and Biaxial Flexural Strength Measurement of Lithium Disilicate Materials.

Objectives: To measure translucency parameter, biaxial flexural strength, and microstructure of various lithium disilicate materials used for dental restorations.
Methods: CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramic blocks: IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent), Cerec Tessera (Dentsply Sirona), and Amber Mill (HASS BIO America) were used (shade A2, HT, and MT). Blocks of each material were milled (PrograMill PM7, Ivoclar Vivadent) into cylinders (diameter = 14 mm) and cut using circular sectioning saw (IsoMET 1000 Precision Saw, Buehler) into disc-shaped specimens (thickness = 1.00 ± 0.05 mm) (n=5/group). They were hand polished to 1200 grit with SiC paper under water lubrication. The translucency parameter of uncrystallized (except IPS e.max CAD) and crystallized samples were tested against a white and black background (with glycerin gel) using a spectrophotometer (UltraScan VIS, HunterLab). A biaxial flexural strength test was performed following ISO 6872. Each specimen was placed centrally on three hardened steel balls (with a diameter of 3.2mm, positioned 120° apart on a support circle with a diameter of 10mm). The maximum load to fracture failure of each specimen was recorded using a universal testing machine (Instron, Model #33R4204 Norwood, MA) with a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. SEM analysis was also done.
Results: Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s HSD statistical analysis (p= 0.05). Materials with significantly different values are denoted with different superscripts. Under SEM imaging, IPS e.max CAD demonstrated long spindle shape crystals. Tessera and Amber Mill contained finer platelet-shaped crystals and Tessera contained a virgilite phase.
Conclusions: Once crystallized, all lithium disilicate materials produced similar translucency despite the smaller crystalline microstructure seen in Tessera and Amber Mill. Despite the presence of an additional virgilite phase in Tessera, it did not produce increased biaxial flexural strength.
Division:
Meeting: 2022 AADOCR/CADR Annual Meeting
Location: Hybrid, Atlanta, Georgia
Year: 2022
Final Presentation ID: 0193
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 1: Ceramic-based Materials
Authors
  • Mangla, Preshtha  ( UAB School of Dentistry , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Lawson, Nathaniel  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Burgess, John  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Singhal, Shashikant  ( Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. , Amherst , New York , United States )
  • Hill, Thomas  ( Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. , Amherst , New York , United States )
  • Mantri, Chandani  ( UAB School of Dentistry , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Gad, Akram  ( UAB School of Dentistry , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Shah, Krisha  ( UAB School of dentistry , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Nizami, Bushra  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    VIRTUAL Interactive Talk Session
    Environmental Effect on Ceramics
    Thursday, 03/24/2022 , 02:00PM - 03:30PM
    TABLES
    Results
    CeramicTranslucencyFiringTranslucency ParameterBiaxial Flexural Strength (MPa)
    IPS e.max CADHTFired30.771±0.912b459.72±52.39x
    IPS e.max CADMTFired29.366±1.243bc396.59±64.88xy
    Cerec TesseraHTUnfired27.447±0.820cd 
    Cerec TesseraHTFired27.665±1.284bcd299.01±119.66xy
    Cerec TesseraMTUnfired24.677±0.187cd 
    Cerec TesseraMTFired24.743±0.585d344.87±49.199xy
    Amber Mill Unfired45.621±1.042a 
    Amber MillHTFired27.364±2.548cd286.07±75.93y
    Amber MillMTFired27.641±3.191bcd316.28±110.41xy