IADR Abstract Archives

Celayense Patients' Characteristics Compared to Ricketts Analysis, Follow Up Study

Objectives: The patients that attend at the orthodontic clinic in the Universidad Latina de Mexico have their own racial characteristics that do not agree with those that were taken into consideration by Ricketts in his cephalometric study, it is necessary to establish measures according to them. OBJECTIVE: to present follow up results using the averages previously established according to racial characteristics from the inhabitants of the region where the Orthodontic Clinic is located, taking in consideration that 67% of the parents and 56% of grandparents are from the same region, showing similar characteristics.
Methods: METHOD: 52 Lateral X rays of active patients diagnosed as Class I by the students in the Orthodontics Clinic of the Latin American University of Mexico were analyzed. 32 Ricketts meassurent were traced again using Nemochep 2D computational program. The inclusion criteria were based on initial study of Ricketts using the dental pattern, and discarding the radiographs which measurements did not comply with the class I molar relationship and with a normal overjet and overbite. 21 were choosen and analyzed according to the means obtained in the previous study by the authors. T-test was used to compare both means.
Results: RESULTS: Only 40% (n:21) Dental Class I cases met inclusion criteria; 23% (n:7) of the measurements were statistically significant: mandibular incisor extrusion, upper molar position to PTV, labial comissure to occlusal plane, facial cone, cranial deflexion, anterior cranial base, and posterior facial height.
Conclusions: CONCLUSION: The results confirm what was established in the first part: it is necessary that each racial group will have their own cephalometric values, authenticating their own carachterists from each region in order to have a correct diagnosis and good results during and after treatment allowing more stability and good function in patiens. Further investigations are suggested with factors with statistical significance
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 1265
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Craniofacial Biology Research
Authors
  • Pons-bonals, Alicia  ( Universidad Latina de Mexico , Queretaro , Queretaro , Mexico )
  • Garcia-londoño, Olga Lucia  ( UNIVERSIDAD LATINA DE MEXICO , Celaya , GUANAJUATO , Mexico )
  • Sosa-ferreyra, Carlos Francisco  ( UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE QUERETARO , Queretaro , QUERETARO , Mexico )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Craniofacial Biology: Bone, Facial Growth and Tooth Movement
    Friday, 03/23/2018 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    CELAYENSE PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS COMPARED TO RICKETTS ANALYSIS, FOLLOW UP STUDY
    MEASUREULM 1ULM 2 T RESULT
    MOLAR RELATIONSHIP-2.0526-2.17620.7266
    CUSPID RELATION 2.51052.48570.7697
    OVERJET INCISOR2.91053.49050.1211
    OVERBITE INCISOR1.22631.70950.2411
    INTERINCISAL ANGLE122.5789122.85710.9160
    CONVEXITY OF POINT A2.72782.42380.6957
    LOWER INCISOR PROTRUSION4.58954.20950.6040
    A1 PROTRUSION7.18427.42860.7448
    LOWER INCISOR INCLINATION28.947427.31820.3585
    A1 INCLINATION28.473730.09520.3691
    OCCLUSAL PLANE -XI3.90532.78570.2675
    OCCLUSAL PLANE INCLINATION18.210519.23810.4172
    PROTRUSION LABIAL-1.8316-2.52860.3205
    UPPER LIP LENGHT28.694729.90480.3491
    FACIAL DEPTH ANGLE90.157990.61900.6613
    FACIAL AXIS ANGLE89.894787.61900.1179
    MANDIBULAR PLANE TO FH ANGLE25.368422.80950.0929
    MAXILLARY DEPTH92.894792.66670.7959
    MAXILLARY HEIGHT59.421160.61900.2995
    PALATAL PLANE TO FH PLANE-1.7895-2.09520.7840
    RAMUS Xi POSITION72.421174.61900.0727
    PORION LOCATION-40.7684-42.25710.2890
    MANDIBULAR ARC36.421137.66670.5251
    CORPUS LENGTH71.394774.40480.0908
    ULM 1. Inclusion criteria on previous study :undergraduate students from Universidad Latina de Mexico, lateral and protrusion free movements, confirm the existence of all teeth without dental treatments, and not more than 2mm crowding. ULM 2. sample selected from orthodontic patients diagnosed as class I
    CELAYENSE PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS COMPARED TO RICKETTS ANALYSIS, FOLLOW UP STUDY. STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANT MEASURES
    MEASUREULM 1ULM 2 T RESULT
    MANDIBULAR INCISOR EXTRUSION0.90001.65240.0218
    LOWER FACIAL HEIGHT17.205319.50000.0266
    LABIAL COMISSURE - OCCLUSAL PLANE-2.8158-4.04760.0325
    FACIAL CONE64.578966.76190.0329
    CRANIAL DEFLEXION grados25.947428.80950.0059
    ANTERIOR CRANIAL BASE53.942158.57620.0035
    POSTERIOR FACIAL HEIGHT64.068470.40480.0100
    LOWER FACIAL HEIGHT45.368444.4762DISCARDED MEASURE
    ULM 1. Inclusion criteria on previous study :undergraduate students from Universidad Latina de Mexico, lateral and protrusion free movements, confirm the existence of all teeth without dental treatments, and not more than 2mm crowding ULM 2. sample selected from orthodontic patients diagnosed as class I