IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of Scanning Direct-preparation, Impression and Cast on CAD/CAM Design

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of scanning the direct preparation, impression and cast on the design of CAD/CAM onlay restorations.
Methods: Fifty standardized MOB onlay preparations were made on first mandibular molars of a Columbia typodont. Fifty impressions of mandibular and maxillary arches were done with silicone elastomeric dental impression materials (Aquasil Easy Mix Putty and Aquasil UltraXLV, Dentsply) and alginate (Jeltrate Chroma, Dentsply), respectively. Impressions were then poured with gypsum according to manufacturer’s instructions. The preparation, buccal bite, and opposing teeth were scanned using an E4D Planmeca scanner. The virtual models were obtained by scanning 3 different options (n=50): 1) typodont (simulated mouth); 2) impressions; and 3) gypsum casts. One hundred-fifty onlay restorations were designed by the Planmeca PlanCAD Design Center software. Five factors were considered in the virtual onlay designs evaluation by a calibrated observer (k=0.81-1.00): 1) large adjustments; 2) small adjustments; 3) material thickness; 4) occlusal contacts; and 5) interproximal contact. The ideal parameters for an onlay restoration provided by the software were used as reference. The data were assessed statistically by descriptive statistics, chi-square test (χ2) followed by the z-residual test with Bonferroni’s adjustment (α=.05).
Results: Factors 1, 2 and 3 did not present significant statistical difference (χ2=1.10-5.03; p=0.08-0.58). For occlusal contacts, the highest frequency of ideal occlusal contacts (92%) was observed by scanning the typodont (χ2=44.92; p<0.01). For interproximal contact, there was no statistical difference of the casts compared to the typodont and impressions. However, scanning the impressions presented greater frequency of ideal interproximal contact (28%) than the typodont (8%) (χ2=8.332; p=0.01).
Conclusions: It was concluded that scanning the typodont provided the most ideal occlusal contacts for the virtual designed CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Scanning the impressions provided a more ideal interproximal contact than scanning the typodont.
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 0479
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): SCADA
Authors
  • Fang, Wendy  ( Stony Brook University , New York , New York , United States )
  • Mai, Mabel  ( Stony Brook University , New York , New York , United States )
  • Wajngarten, Danielle  ( Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara , Araraquara , São Paulo , Brazil )
  • Amarillas Gastelum, Clarisa  ( Stony Brook University , New York , New York , United States )
  • Nasti, Ann  ( Stony Brook University , New York , New York , United States )
  • Botta, Ana  ( Stony Brook University , New York , New York , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Clinical Science/Public Health Research
    Thursday, 03/22/2018 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM