IADR Abstract Archives

Mechanical, Chemical and Bond Strength Properties of Bisphenol-A Free Composites

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate mechanical, chemical and bond strength properties of bisphenol-A free (BPA-free) resin-based composite (RBC) containing an elastomeric monomer.
Methods: BPA-free RBCs were blended either containing 60/25/14wt% of UDMA, PEG400 and TEGDMA (UDMA) or 35/25/25/14wt% of UDMA, PEG400, Exothane 24 and TEGDMA (UDMA-EXO) monomers. Camphorquinone (0.5wt%) and DMPOH (0.5wt%) were added as the photoinitiator system and, 52wt% of 7.5µm BaBAlSi glass and 13wt% 40nm fumed silica were added as filler loading. A multiwave LED (VALO, Ultradent) was used to photo-activate all samples. Mechanical properties (n=10) were assessed by ultimate tensile strength (UTS), flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM) e Knoop hardness (H) tests. Chemical properties (n=10) were assessed by degree of conversion (DC), chemical softening (CSoft), water sorption (Wsp) and water solubility (Wsl). For Microtensile bond strength test, twenty box shaped Class I (4 mm in depth) preparations were fabricated in the pulp chamber of sound human third molars. The restorations were made (two layers of 2-mm in thickness) using either a UDMA or UDMA-EXO experimental composites (n=10). After 24 h in water storage, the restorations were sectioned in beams (0.81 mm2 area) and tested for dentin microtensile bond strength (µTBS). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05, β=0.2) for all tests.
Results: The Table 1 shows all means for all performed tests. The results showed that BPA-free RBCs containing UDMA-EXO showed lower FS and FM than UDMA, but no differences were found for CS and Wsol. However, UDMA-EXO showed lower CSoft and Wsp and higher H, DC and microtensile bond strength than UDMA.
Conclusions: Thus, it was possible to conclude that despite the reduction in mechanical properties, the use of an elastomeric monomer could improve chemical properties and increase bond strength of BPA-free RBCs.
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 0265
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2:Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Sinhoreti, Mario  ( Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP , Piracicaba, SP , Brazil )
  • De Oliveira, Robson  ( Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP , Piracicaba, SP , Brazil )
  • De Oliveira, Dayane  ( Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP , Piracicaba, SP , Brazil )
  • Rocha, Mateus  ( Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP , Piracicaba, SP , Brazil )
  • Roulet, Jean-francois  ( University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Geraldeli, Saulo  ( University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: FAPESP grant #14/11301-4
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials: Polymer-based Materials I
    Thursday, 03/22/2018 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Means of each group for all performed tests.
     UTS (MPa)FS (MPa)FM (GPa)H (KHN)DC (%)CSoft (%)Wsp (g/mm3x10-4)Wsl (g/mm3x10-4)µTBS (MPa)
    UDMA72.5 a120.4 a2.04 a36.1 b61.4 b40.0 a3.62 a0.138 a12.5 b
    UDMA-EXO68.4 b108.2 b1.82 a44.0 a85.9 a31.3 b3.50 b0.090 a18.4 a
    Means followed by different small letter in the column represent statistical difference by Tukey s test.