Effect of Dental Headlamp and Blue-Blocker on Pre-mature Sealant
Objectives: To compare the effects of exposure to dental headlamp source and Blue-Blocking filter on premature curing of a variety of commercial pit-and-fissure sealants. Methods: Thin (≈0.1mm) specimens of uncured commercial pit-and-fissure sealants (Bis-GMA-containing: Clinpro (3M/ESPE), Ultraseal XT (Ultradent); Non-Bis-GMA-containing: Embrace (Pulpdent), Toothfairy (Septodont)) were placed on the diamond element of a temperature-controlled (30°C) ATR stage of an FTIR spectrometer. Specimens were exposed to light from an LED-based dental headlamp (RADBL23, Q-optics, at 16”) for 80s. Real-time infrared spectra were obtained (1 scan/s, resolution 2 cm-1), from which monomer conversion values were determined. N=5/group, specimens made in randomized order. The process was repeated, with the Blue-Blocking filter of the light in place. The time at which specimens first demonstrated onset of conversion was noted and compared within the presence or absence of the Blue-Blocker filter among sealant composition and product, using a 2-way ANOVA. The Tukey test was used to compare mean pairs. T-tests compared onset times of the same material between use of Blue-Blocker. Pre-set alpha was 0.05. Results: Table presents results. For the 2-way analyses, all factors, and their interaction term, demonstrated significant influences on onset time (p<0.001). Thus, two 1-WAY ANOVAs among pooled groups within a Blue-Blocker group were performed. When no blue blocker was present, Toothfairy had a significantly shorter onset time (p<0.001) than the other products, which were not different. When using the Blue-Blocker, no detectable cure occurred during headlamp exposure. Conclusions: Dental sealants can start to prematurely cure from headlamp exposure within 8 to 13 seconds, but use of Blue-Blocker filters prevents curing for at least up to 80 seconds.
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting:2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida) Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018 Final Presentation ID:0275 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 6: Instruments and Equipment
Authors
Scavone, Damie
( School of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University
, Augusta
, Georgia
, United States
)
Farr, Taylor
( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University
, Augusta
, Georgia
, United States
)
Christman, Ashley
( School of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University
, Augusta
, Georgia
, United States
)
Babb, Courtney
( Dental College of Georgia
, Augusta
, Georgia
, United States
)
Rueggeberg, Frederick
( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University
, Augusta
, Georgia
, United States
)
Polymerization onset times (mean (sd)) of various types of pit-and-fissure sealant materials (n=5 specimens/condition) when exposed to a dental headlamp having a Blue-Blocker filter or not.
POLYMERIZATION ONSET TIME (s)
PRESENCE OF BLUE-BLOCKER
SEALANT COMPOSITION
PRODUCT
NO BLUE BLOCKER
WITH BLUE-BLOCKER
BIS-GMA CONTAINING
CLINPRO
13.2 (1.5) Ab
>80 (0.0) Aa
ULTRASEAL XT
13.2 (1.1) Ab
>80 (0.0) Aa
NON-BIS-GMA CONTAINING
EMBRACE
13.4 (1.1) Ab
>80 (0.0) Aa
TOOTHFAIRY
8.2 (1.3) Bb
>80 (0.0) Aa
Values within cells having similar letters (upper case – column, between products; lower case – row between Blue-Blocker presence within product) are not significantly different. Value of “>80” means no detectable cure noted during 80-s of exposure.