IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of Dental Headlamp and Blue-Blocker on Pre-mature Sealant

Objectives: To compare the effects of exposure to dental headlamp source and Blue-Blocking filter on premature curing of a variety of commercial pit-and-fissure sealants.
Methods: Thin (≈0.1mm) specimens of uncured commercial pit-and-fissure sealants (Bis-GMA-containing: Clinpro (3M/ESPE), Ultraseal XT (Ultradent); Non-Bis-GMA-containing: Embrace (Pulpdent), Toothfairy (Septodont)) were placed on the diamond element of a temperature-controlled (30°C) ATR stage of an FTIR spectrometer. Specimens were exposed to light from an LED-based dental headlamp (RADBL23, Q-optics, at 16”) for 80s. Real-time infrared spectra were obtained (1 scan/s, resolution 2 cm-1), from which monomer conversion values were determined. N=5/group, specimens made in randomized order. The process was repeated, with the Blue-Blocking filter of the light in place. The time at which specimens first demonstrated onset of conversion was noted and compared within the presence or absence of the Blue-Blocker filter among sealant composition and product, using a 2-way ANOVA. The Tukey test was used to compare mean pairs. T-tests compared onset times of the same material between use of Blue-Blocker. Pre-set alpha was 0.05.
Results: Table presents results. For the 2-way analyses, all factors, and their interaction term, demonstrated significant influences on onset time (p<0.001). Thus, two 1-WAY ANOVAs among pooled groups within a Blue-Blocker group were performed. When no blue blocker was present, Toothfairy had a significantly shorter onset time (p<0.001) than the other products, which were not different. When using the Blue-Blocker, no detectable cure occurred during headlamp exposure.
Conclusions: Dental sealants can start to prematurely cure from headlamp exposure within 8 to 13 seconds, but use of Blue-Blocker filters prevents curing for at least up to 80 seconds.
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 0275
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 6: Instruments and Equipment
Authors
  • Scavone, Damie  ( School of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Farr, Taylor  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Christman, Ashley  ( School of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Babb, Courtney  ( Dental College of Georgia , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Rueggeberg, Frederick  ( Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials: Polymer-based Materials I
    Thursday, 03/22/2018 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Polymerization onset times (mean (sd)) of various types of pit-and-fissure sealant materials (n=5 specimens/condition) when exposed to a dental headlamp having a Blue-Blocker filter or not.
      POLYMERIZATION ONSET TIME (s)
      PRESENCE OF BLUE-BLOCKER
    SEALANT COMPOSITIONPRODUCTNO BLUE BLOCKERWITH BLUE-BLOCKER
    BIS-GMA CONTAININGCLINPRO13.2 (1.5) Ab>80 (0.0) Aa
    ULTRASEAL XT13.2 (1.1) Ab>80 (0.0) Aa
    NON-BIS-GMA CONTAININGEMBRACE13.4 (1.1) Ab>80 (0.0) Aa
    TOOTHFAIRY8.2 (1.3) Bb>80 (0.0) Aa
    Values within cells having similar letters (upper case – column, between products; lower case – row between Blue-Blocker presence within product) are not significantly different. Value of “>80” means no detectable cure noted during 80-s of exposure.