Masking Effect and Specular Index Between Dental Veneering Ceramics
Objectives: Determine significant differences in masking effect (ME) and specular index (SI) between combinations of substructure and veneering ceramic materials. Methods: Disc-shaped samples (n=5/gp/shade) of porcelain fused to metal (PFM), porcelain fused to zirconia (PFZ), and lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDG) materials were made in A2, B2, and C2 shades and polished with sandpaper. Reflectance spectra were obtained with a CM-700d spectrophotometer on white then on black backing for each sample. Separate reflectance measurements were made with specular light component excluded (SCE) and included (SCI) for 3 different illuminants: daylight (D65), fluorescent (F2), and incandescent (A). ME and SI were determined using CIE L*a*b* color formula. Three-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) tests were performed to determine statistical differences in ME and SI between materials of the same shade and between different material shades. Results: All A2 materials have significantly different masking effects under all illuminants. Masking effect in both B2 and C2 materials in daylight was significantly different from masking effect under fluorescent and incandescent illuminants across all materials. LDG B2 masking effect is not significantly different within its shade when comparing illuminants. For A2, specular index of any material is significantly different from other materials on white backing. For B2 and C2 shades, specular index is not significantly different between any illuminants within materials. Specular index of B2 LDG is significantly different from specular index of PFM and PFZ materials under all illuminants. Specular indices within PFM were similar when accounting for backing, SCI/SCE, shade and illuminant. Masking effect in PFZ SCE and LDG SCE were different from their respective SCI across all shades and backings. Specular indexes of LDG and PFZ in A2 shade were significantly different from both B2 and C2. Conclusions: Illuminants and material translucence have a significant effect on color, possibly impacting restorative material choice and shade consistency.
Differences between and within materials and shades of ceramic materials.
Material and Shade
PFM A2
PFM B2
PFM C2
PFZ A2
PFZ B2
PFZ C2
LDG A2
LDG B2
LDG C2
PFM A2
ME
SIw
SI
PFM B2
MEI
ME
ME
SI
ME, SI
ME
PFM C2
MEI
PFZ A2
SIw
ME
SI
SI
SI
PFZ B2
ME
SI
MEI
SI
PFZ C2
ME
SI
MEI
LDG A2
SI
SI
ME
SI
SI
LDG B2
ME, SI
SI
SI
MEI
LDG C2
ME
SI
MEI
“ME” denotes difference in masking effect under all illuminants, “MEI” denotes difference in ME comparing daylight to fluorescent/incandescent illuminants, “SI" denotes difference in SI on both white and black backgrounds, and “SIw” denotes difference in SI only on white background.