IADR Abstract Archives

Microtensile Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive-Vitroceramics Incorporated Into Adhesive Systems

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of different concentrations of vitreous ceramic particles (Biosilicate®) on dentin bond strength (DBS) of experimental self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.
Methods: Forty sound human molars were cut in quarters and flattened. Standardized smear layer on the exposed dentin surfaces was achieved with 600-grit silicon carbide paper and water. The quarters of the same tooth (n=20) were treated with different percentages (0% - control; 2% and 5% - by weight) of Biosilicate®, incorporated into two experimental adhesive systems: Exp-1 (total etch, 2 steps) and Exp-2 (self-etching, 2 steps) that were compared with the respective commercial adhesive system (Single Bond, 3M ESPE and AdheSE, Ivoclar Vivadent). The adhesive systems were applied and light-cured for 10 seconds. A composite resin (Z350, 3M ESPE) block (6 mm high) was built up 3 increments on the dentin surface. Each layer was light-cured for 20 seconds. The quarters were sectioned (Isomet 1000, Buehler) perpendicular to the bond surface (0.9x0.9mm), and the beams were randomly separated into two aging groups: Immediate or 6 months distilled/deionized water (37°C). The microtensile DBS was tested (0.5mm/s). The failure type of the beams was examined by stereomicroscope and TEM. Data were statistically analyzed (2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni, p<0.05).
Results: The Exp-2 self-etch adhesive presented higher DBS than Exp-1 etch-and-rinse, different (p<.05) from all other groups, except (p>.05) for 5% of the Biosilicate® group. Commercial and Exp-1 adhesives presented similar results (p>.05) regardless the percentage of Biosilicate® added. There was no difference between immediate and 6 months groups, irrespective the concentration of the Biosilicate®.
Conclusions: The addition of Biosilicate® particles is not feasible for the etch-and-rinse adhesive system. For self-etch adhesive, the addition of 2% of Biosilicate® does not cause adverse effects on the material’s properties.
Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Year: 2018
Final Presentation ID: 0545
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
  • Pires-de-souza, Fernanda  ( University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry , Ribeirao Preto , Brazil )
  • Contente, Marta  ( University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry , Ribeirao Preto , Brazil )
  • Tonani, Rafaella  ( University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry , Ribeirao Preto , Brazil )
  • Vincenti, Sergio  ( University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry , Ribeirao Preto , Brazil )
  • Sinhoreti, Mario  ( University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School , Piracicaba , Brazil )
  • Geraldeli, Saulo  ( University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Roulet, Jean-francois  ( University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Brazil) - Grant# 2015/17917-0
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    Keynote Address; Dental Materials: Durability of Adhesive Interfaces
    Thursday, 03/22/2018 , 02:00PM - 03:30PM