IADR Abstract Archives

Correlation between symptoms and external cracked tooth characteristics: National-Dental-PBRN study

Objectives: To determine which external tooth/crack characteristics correlate with cracked teeth being symptomatic.
Methods: Dentists in National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN; www.NationalDentalPBRN.org) enrolled subjects each with a single, vital posterior tooth with at least one observable external crack. Data were collected at the patient-, tooth- and crack- level. Teeth were determined to be symptomatic if they were spontaneously painful, or painful to cold and/or bite testing. Frequencies according to whether or not symptomatic were obtained and odds ratio calculated. Stepwise regression using generalized model to adjust for clustering was performed; characteristics with p<0.05 were retained.
Results: 209 network dentists enrolled 2,780 subjects/cracked teeth (one per patient) with a symptomatic or asymptomatic cracked posterior tooth. 1,234 (44%) of these enrolled teeth were symptomatic.1,013 (36%) of the population were male, average age was 54(SD=12); range 19-85 years. The number of external cracks per enrolled tooth: 1: 992(36%); 2: 736(26%); 3: 487(18%); 4: 301(11%); 5: 147(5%); 6: 66(2%); 7 or more cracks 51(2%). Distribution of tooth surfaces with a crack: mesial: 1,249(45%); distal 1,394(50%); occlusal 1,198 (43%); facial 1,392(50%); lingual 1,429(51%). Of 1,234 symptomatic, 352(28%) had spontaneous pain. The following table presents frequencies and crude associations of various tooth/crack characteristics to a cracked tooth being symptomatic:

In adjusted analysis, molar location (OR= 1.84; p<0.001), blocking trans-illuminated light (OR= 1.47; p=0.005), caries present (OR= 1.36; p= 0.02), crack on distal surface (OR= 1.28; p<0.001), or wear facet through enamel (OR= 1.22; p= .01) were associated with increased odds of being symptomatic. Conversely, if NCCL was present (OR= 0.65; p=0.02) or if crack stained (OR=0.69; p<0.001) were associated with decreased odds of being symptomatic.
Conclusions: A number of tooth- and crack-level characteristics are significantly associated with symptomatic cracked teeth. Support: U19-DE-22516.
AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
2016 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Los Angeles, California)
Los Angeles, California
2016
1454
Prosthodontics Research
  • Hilton, Thomas  ( Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , United States )
  • Baltuck, Camille  ( University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , United States )
  • Manning, Walt  ( Private Practice , Albany , Oregon , United States )
  • Funkhouser, Ellen  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , United States )
  • Vij, Vibha  ( Westat , Rockville , Maryland , United States )
  • Ferracane, Jack  ( Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , United States )
  • NIDCR- U19-DE-22516
    NONE
    Poster Session
    Prosthodontics Research I
    Friday, 03/18/2016 , 03:30PM - 04:45PM
     Asymptomatic
    (N=1,546)
    Symptomatic
    (N=1,234)
    Crude
    CharacteristicN%N%Odds Ratio (1)p-value
    Tooth level      
    Molar1,20078%1,07687%1.96<.001
    Maxillary63441%51442%1.03.7
    Restoration present1,42792%1,13792%0.98.8
    In occlusion1,50597%1,21098%1.37.2
    Wear facet through enamel35123%32526%1.22.03
    Exposed root36323%25621%0.85.08
    RPD abutment161%40%0.31.03
    FPD abutment00%30%8.70.052
    NCCL present16311%867%0.64.001
    Crack level      
    Stained1,26582%97779%0.84.08
    Blocks transilluminated light94861%86170%1.46<.001
    Tactilely perceptible1,06069%85369%1.03.7
    Connects with restoration1,11472%91474%1.11.2
    Horizontal direction47030%39932%1.09.3
    Vertical direction1,43092%1,16995%1.46.02
    Oblique direction1459%13211%1.16.2
    Surfaces      
    Mesial68544%56446%1.06.5
    Occlusal64542%55345%1.13.10
    Distal71846%67655%1.40<.001
    Facial77250%62050%1.01.9
    Lingual76149%66854%1.22.01
           
    (1) Odds ratio for symptomatic/asymptomatic