IADR Abstract Archives

Comparison of Cutting Effectiveness of Diamond Burs with Zr Blocks

Monolithic zirconia restorations are popular but removing these crowns is difficult.

Objective:To measure and compare the cutting effectiveness of 10 types of diamond burs through monolithic sintered zirconia.

Method:10 types of diamond burs (n=8) were compared for the cutting effectiveness in Zirconia (CERCON; DeguDent) using a high speed computer controlled cutting device with water spray (5.45L/min). The turbine used to cut the blocks rotated at 300,000 rpm and with the burs at a depth of 2mm into the zirconia during cutting.  A 100 gm load was applied during cutting for each bur which made 2-9minute cuts. Zirconia blocks were ultrasonically cleaned (10 minutes-acetone), dried in an oven at 200°C for 5 minutes before and after each cut and weighed (OHAUS Discovery Balances). The length of the cut was also recorded with a 3D digital microscope (Keyence VHX6000). The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Turkey/Kramer post-hoc tests (p=0.05).

Result: Weight loss (Mean ±SD) (n=8).

Items with the same superscript are not statistically different.

 

 Group No.

Bur No./ Manufacturer

1st Cut /mg

2nd Cut/mg

total

1

6856DC.31.016/ BRASSELER USA

39.99±8.4c,d

22.93±2.3c,d

62.9b,c

2

8856DF.31.016/ BRASSELER USA

12.58±2.5a,b

7.56±2.4a,b

20.1a

3

856DEF.31.016/ BRASSELER USA

7.2±1.4a

6.5±5.9a

13.7a

4

ZR6850.314.016/ KOMET USA

30.59±7.1a,b,c

22.28±4c,d

52.9b,c

5

ZR6881.314.016/ KOMET USA

98.68±32.5e

24.48±7.6d

123.2d

6

F4R SC/ A&M instruments

61.21±25.5d

16.7±7.9b,c,d

77.9c

7

5850.314.016/ KOMET USA

36.13±6.3b,c

18.01±5.6c,d

54.1b,c

8

S5856.314.016/ KOMET USA

33.23±8.4b,c

14.76±7.6a,b,c

48.0b

9

6850.314.016/ KOMET USA

29.2±7.7a,b,c

18.26±8.0c,d

47.5b

10

770.8VF ZIRCONIA/ PREMIER

41.4±12.0c,d

21.1±3.81c,d

62.5b,c

Conclusion: Overall Komet diamonds (Group 5) cut zirconia significantly greater than all other diamonds (p<.05).  The second 9 minute cut was less than the first cut except for the Group 3 which produced the least cutting. Reduced cutting effectiveness after the first cut indicates that these diamonds may be single use.

AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
2014 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Charlotte, North Carolina)
Charlotte, North Carolina
2014
707
Dental Materials 10: Instruments and Equipment
  • Lin, Ching-kai  ( University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA )
  • Oral Session
    Keynote Address; Dental Instruments and Equipment
    03/21/2014