Fluoride varnish is widely used in North America and Europe to reduce caries risk and remineralize enamel tooth structure. The aim of this study was to determine physico-chemical surface properties of five fluoride varnishes, which include the wettability and outermost layer chemical composition.
Method:
Five brands of fluoride varnish were used in this study: FluoroDose (PD), 3M Vanish (3M), Enamel Pro Varnish (EP) and Fluor Protector (FP). Samples were stored at room temperature and characterized with the following techniques: 1) Wettability was tested using a Contact Angle test (CA) [Ramé-hart Standard Goniometer Model 200]. Each specimen was mixed according to manufacturer’s instructions and applied in a thin coat to a glass slab. Each specimen was allowed to set for at least 4 hours, from which point the contact angle test was administered. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA, Tukey test p<0.05. 2) Surface chemical composition was carried out using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), [Kratos Axis Ultra system] and compared with the bulk composition as determined by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis [Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700]. Each varnish was mixed as per the manufacturer’s instructions and applied to a glass slide in a thin coating. Each specimen (n=3) was tested immediately after application.
Result:
Contact angle testing shows that the wettability means are significantly different (p<0.05). FTIR results showed that FD, 3M and ED have a similar chemical composition, different from FP. XPS Atomic percentage of the samples is shown in the table below.
|
C |
O |
F |
Na |
Cl |
N |
FluoroDose |
90.14 |
8.29 |
- |
1.25 |
0.33 |
- |
3M Vanish |
91.34 |
8.66 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Enamel Pro |
88 |
10.39 |
- |
1.22 |
0.39 |
- |
Fluor Protector |
70.81 |
18.60 |
0.39 |
- |
- |
10.2 |
Conclusion:
Fluoride concentration is very low on the surface due to a strong amount of hydrocarbon on sample surfaces.