IADR Abstract Archives

Mechanical Properties of New Dental Pulp-Capping Materials Over Time

Several new pulp-capping materials have been introduced to the market recently.   The physical properties of these new materials may affect their resistance to fracture under load during placement of a final restorative material or support of an overlying restorative material over time. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength/modulus and compressive strength of the new pulp-capping materials (TheraCal LC, Bisco; Biodentine, Septodont) compared to mineral trioxide aggregate  (ProRoot MTA, Dentsply), and calcium hydroxide (Dycal, Dentsply) over time.  Method: Ten specimens per group were formed as per manufacturers’ directions in a 2x2x25mm split mold for flexural strength/modulus testing and in a 6mm long x 4mm diameter split mold for compressive strength testing.  Specimens were stored in darkness at 37°C and 98% humidity in a lab oven.  After 15 minutes, 3 hours, and 24 hours, specimens were tested to failure in a universal testing machine (Instron).  Flexural modulus was determined from the slope of the linear region of the load-deflection curve. A mean and standard deviation was determined per group.  Data was analyzed with multiple ANOVA/Tukey’s test (alpha=0.007). Result: A significant difference was found between groups based on material or time (p<0.007). Conclusion: MTA did not set at 15 minutes. At all time periods, TheraCal had the greatest flexural and compressive strength. After 3 and 24 hours, Biodentine had the greatest flexural modulus.  Discussion: TheraCal had greater early strength to potentially resist fracture during immediate placement of a final restorative material. However, Biodentine was the least flexible after three hours for potentially greater support of an overlying restoration under function over time.

Flexural Strength MPa (st dev)

Material

Time

15 mins

3 hrs

24 hrs

Dycal

2.7 (0.5) Bb

4.9 (1.3) Ab

6.3 (1.7) Ac

MTA

Did not set

1.1 (0.6) Bb

4.8 (3.5) Ac

Biodentine

0.6 (0.5) Bb

9.4 (5.0) Ab

13.4 (5.2) Ab

TheraCal

31.1 (9.2) Aa

41.2 (10.1) Aa

33.3 (6.5) Aa

Groups with the same upper case letter per row or lower case letter per column are not significantly different (p>0.007).

 

Flexural Modulus GPa (st dev)

Material

Time

15 mins

3 hrs

24 hrs

Dycal

0.7 (0.3) Cb

2.2 (0.4) Bb

3.5 (1.1) Ab

MTA

Did not set

1.7 (1.4) Bb

6.6 (3.3) Ab

Biodentine

0.6 (0.8) Cb

9.3 (4.1) Ba

24.1 (5.5) Aa

TheraCal

1.9 (0.7) Aa

1.8 (0.6) Ab

2.0 (0.6) Ab

Groups with the same upper case letter per row or lower case letter per column are not significantly different (p>0.007).

 

Compressive Strength MPa (st dev)

Material

Time

15 mins

3 hrs

24 hrs

Dycal

7.7 (2.1) Bb

16.3 (5.0) Abc

20.4 (5.8) Abc

MTA

Did not set

0.5 (0.2) Bc

5.9 (2.2) Ac

Biodentine

1.3 (0.5) Bb

33.9 (13.1) Ab

40.1 (10.1) Ab

TheraCal

87.7 (18.8) Aa

95.8 (20.9) Aa

102.8 (26.9) Aa

Groups with the same upper case letter per row or lower case letter per column are not significantly different (p>0.007).

 

AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
2014 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Charlotte, North Carolina)
Charlotte, North Carolina
2014
495
Dental Materials 9: Other Materials - Chemistry, Properties and Performance
  • Nielsen, Matthew  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Vanderweele, Richard  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Casey, Jeffery  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Vandewalle, Kraig  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Poster Session
    Materials Properties and Chemistry
    03/20/2014