IADR Abstract Archives

Cross-Sectional vs. Longitudinal Fluoride Intake Measures as Correlates of Fluorosis

Objective: 

To explore the relative utility of cross-sectional fluoride intake measures and Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) measures of fluoride intake based upon longitudinal follow-up as predictors of dental fluorosis in the early permanent dentition, motivated by the lack of universal availability of longitudinal measures. 

Method: 

Multiple measures of fluoride intake were available for participants in the Iowa Fluoride Study, a cohort study of children recruited perinatally:  intakes based upon dietary report at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of age (cross-sectional) and AUCs reflecting intake from birth until 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (longitudinal).  All measures were available for 237 of 544 children participating in an associated study of genetic and environmental determinants of dental fluorosis.  Quantitative definitions of dental fluorosis were based upon the number of affected teeth or zones based upon the Fluorosis Risk Index (FRI).  Spearman correlational analyses were used to assess which fluoride intake measurements had the strongest correlations with fluorosis phenotypes; performance of competing predictors was assessed using the method of Dunn and Clark (1969). 

Result: 

Most fluoride intake variables were strongly correlated among themselves.  Among cross sectional measures of fluoride intake, the strongest correlations with fluorosis outcomes were for fluoride intake at 36 months (r=0.22-0.27; all p<0.001); among longitudinal measures, it was AUC from birth to 48 months (r=0.24-0.31; all p<0.0002). There was no evidence that these intake measures differed significantly in predictive ability. 

Conclusion: 

These results suggest that cross-sectional fluoride intake measures may reasonably be used when longitudinal measures are not available.  Similarly, if the stringent completeness criteria of AUC measures create significant missing data, substitution of cross-sectional measures results in increased sample size and greater statistical power.  We recommend the use of the cross-sectional measurement at 36 months as a substitute for the AUC measures.

Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2014 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Charlotte, North Carolina)
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Year: 2014
Final Presentation ID: 327
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Behavioral, Epidemiologic, and Health Services Research
Authors
  • Pagan-rivera, Keyla  ( University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA )
  • Bhagavatula, Pradeep  ( Marquette College of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, USA )
  • Levy, Steven  ( University of Iowa, Preventive and Community Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA )
  • Warren, John J.  ( University of Iowa, Preventive and Community Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA )
  • Broffitt, Barb  ( University of Iowa, Preventive and Community Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA )
  • Dawson, Deborah  ( University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Public Health
    03/20/2014