IADR Abstract Archives

Physical Properties of New Dual-Cured Composite Restorative Materials

Objective: To compare the physical properties of new dual-cure, bulk-fill restorative composites (Injectafil DC, Apex; Hyperfill, Parkell) to a hybrid composite material (Filtek Z250, 3M/ESPE). Method: Depth of cure, volumetric shrinkage, fracture toughness, porosity, and microleakage were examined.  For depth of cure, a cylindrical mold (4x14mm long) was filled with composite and light-cured for 20 secs (40 secs for Hyperfill) at 1200 mW/cm2 (Bluephase G2, Ivoclar) or allowed to self-cure (n=5).  Uncured composite was removed and remaining polymerized composite was measured and divided by two.  For volumetric shrinkage, composite was placed in a video-imaging device (AcuVol, Bisco) and light-cured or allowed to self-cure.  Shrinkage was recorded continuously for ten minutes (n=10). For fracture toughness, single-edge notched-beam specimens were created in a mold (2.5x5x25mm), light-cured or allowed to self-cure, stored for 24-hours at 37oC in water, and tested in 3-point flexure (n=10).  For porosity, specimens were created in a proximal slot preparation in an extracted human third molar. Composite was incrementally placed and light-cured (Z250) or placed in bulk (Hyperfill, Injectafil) and light-cured or allowed to self-cure.  The teeth were scanned with a microtomographic unit (Bruker) for porosity formation, then thermocycled, placed in dye, sectioned, and analyzed for microleakage using Image J software (NIH).  Dye penetration was expressed as a percentage of the length of microleakage divided by the length of the restorative interface (n=10). A mean and standard deviation were determined per group.  Data was analyzed with ANOVA/Tukey’s test per property (alpha=0.05).  Percent porosity was evaluated with a Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U test (alpha=0.005). Result:  Significant differences were found between groups per property. See table. Conclusion: Compared to the incrementally placed composite (Filtek Z250), the new dual-cure, bulk-fill restorative composites (Hyperfill, Injectafil) in self-cure mode had complete depth of cure, similar fracture toughness and porosity formation, but greater polymerization shrinkage and microleakage.

 

Restorative Material

 

Physical Property

Mean (std dev)

Depth of Cure

(mm)

Volumetric Polymerization Shrinkage

(%)

Porosity

(%)

Fracture Toughness

(MPa m1/2)

Microleakage

(%)

Hyperfill Light Cured

(Universal)

2.36 (0.10) b

2.9 (0.4) ab

0.16 (0.36) a

1.85 (0.17) a

43% (30%) c

Hyperfill Self Cured

(Universal)

 Full Cure

3.6 (0.7) b

0.36 (0.26) ab

1.87 (0.26) a

48% (28%) c

Injectafil DC Light Cure

(Universal)

2.06 (0.04) c

5.2 (0.5) c

0.28 (0.19) ab

1.83 (0.57) a

38% (27%) bc

Injectafil DC Self Cured

(Universal)

Full Cure

3.1 (0.6) b

0.43 (0.21) b

1.61 (0.24) a

39% (33%) bc

Filtek Z250

(A2)

3.57 (0.02) a

2.3 (0.3) a

0.69 (0.83) b

1.81 (0.17) a

22% (20%) a

Groups with the same letter per column are not significantly different (p>0.05)


Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2014 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Charlotte, North Carolina)
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Year: 2014
Final Presentation ID: 1164
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 7: Polymer-based Materials-Physical Properties and Performance
Authors
  • Vandewalker, Jon  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Lincoln, Todd  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Casey, Jeffery  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • Vandewalle, Kraig  ( USAF, JBSA-Lackland, TX, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Restorative Resins - Mechanical Properties
    03/21/2014