IADR Abstract Archives

Comparing Compressive Strengths:  New Self-adhesive Bulkfill Material to Restorative Materials

Objective: Amalgams are being phased out of modern-day dentistry; a need for an easy use over bulk fill, material has developed. The following study tests a new product that has potential to meet those objectives. Evaluate the compressive strength of a new self-adhesive bulkfill material (DO-UC, 3M ESPE) to glass ionomer (GI), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and composite materials.

Method: Materials tested (n=8 per group): Group A, Dyract® (DENTSPLY); Group B, Heliomolar® (Ivoclar Vivadent); Group C, DO-UC Capsule (3M ESPE); Group D, DO-UC Handmix (3M ESPE); Group E, Fuji II™ LC (GC America); Group F, Vitremer™ (3M ESPE); Group G, Kentac™ N100 (3M ESPE); Group H, Ketac™ Nano (3M ESPE); Group I, Fuji IX™ GP Capsule (GC America); Group J, Fuji IX™ GP Handmix (GC America); Group K, Chemfil® Rock (Dentsply).  All samples were made using polyoxymethylene (Delrin®) molds with 3x3x5mm for light-cured specimens and 4x6mm for self-cured specimens.  Samples were fabricated and cured according to manufacturers’ instructions. Self-cured specimens were put in 37°C water bath for 1hr after preparation. All samples sat in distilled water (37°C/24hrs) to complete cure. A universal Zwick machine loaded (10kN; crosshead speed 1.0mm/min) measured compressive strengths until fracture. One-way ANOVA and Fisher method tests showed a p<0.05.

Result: 

Light-Cured (n=8 for each group):

Group

Mix System

Type of Material

Results Mean±SD (MPa)

A

Compule

Composite

313,9±33,4

B

Compule

Composite

309,5±17,8

C

Capsule

New

292,4±23.4

D

Handmix

New

266,6±22

E

Handmix

RMGI

229±15

F

Handmix

RMGI

195,5±14,6

G

Clicker

RMGI

195,5±47,3

H

Compule

RMGI

223,4±5,2

 Self-Cured (n=8 for each group):

Group

Mix System

Type of Material

Results Mean±SD (MPa)

C

Capsule

New

273,3±12,2

D

Handmix

New

272±19,4

I

Capsule

GI

199,5±37,1

J

Handmix

GI

187±21,2

K

Capsule

GI

191,5±6,4

For light-cured groups, both composites and the DO-UC capsule were significantly higher than the GI and RMGIs. For self-cured the DO-UC materials performed significantly higher than the GI materials.

Conclusion: The compressive strength of the DO-UC was significantly higher in comparison to the tested GI and RMGI materials. Values for DO-UC were comparable to the composites and there was no statistically significant difference between these groups. Further testing is required; this new material shows potential for use as a self-adhesive bulkfill product.

Division: AADR/CADR Annual Meeting
Meeting: 2014 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting (Charlotte, North Carolina)
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Year: 2014
Final Presentation ID: 1149
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 7: Polymer-based Materials-Physical Properties and Performance
Authors
  • Michelson, Courtney  ( Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA )
  • Perry, Ronald D.  ( Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA )
  • Kugel, Gerard  ( Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA )
  • SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Restorative Resins - Mechanical Properties
    03/21/2014