IADR Abstract Archives

How Different Toothpastes Effect the Bleached Enamel Roughness?

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of different toothpastes on surface roughness of bleached enamel.
Methods: A total of 60 healthy bovine incisor teeth were used for the study. After the teeh were in-office laser-bleached, they were randomly divided into five groups to receive brushing with the following toothpastes (n=12): G1- regular toothpaste (Colgate Total 12), G2- whitening toothpaste with poloxamer (Colgate Optic White Oxygen), G3-whitening toothpaste with hyrogen peroxide (Colgate Optic White Expert), G4- whitening toothpaste with charcoal powder (Colgate Optic White Charcoal) G5- anti-erosive/desentizing toothpaste (Sensodyne Proenamel). All groups were subjected to brushing using toothbrushing simulation machine, approximating the equivalent of 2 weeks of regular brushing. Surface roughness (Ra, µm) analyses of each group were performed before bleaching-baseline (T0), immediately after bleaching (T1) and tooth brushing after bleaching (T2) by using a contact stylus profilometer. The data were analyzed by repeated measure analysis of variance, Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).
Results: There were no statistically significant differences over time (T0 vs T1 vs T2) in Ra for all tested toothpaste groups except for anti-erosive/desentizing toothpaste group (G5) (p>0.05). In G5, significant difference was detected between baseline (T0) and brushing after bleaching (T2) (p<0.05). However no difference was found between (T1) and (T2) (p>0.05). When comparing all groups at T2, the anti-erosive/desensitizing toothpaste-G5 demonstrated the lowest surface roughness significantly differing from that of the other groups (p<0.05). No significant difference was detected among the rest of the toothpaste groups (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Simulated brushing with different toothpastes did not alter the roughness of laser-bleached enamel. Only the use anti-erosive/desensitizing toothpaste after bleaching seems to be effective in reducing the initial surface roughness of the enamel.
Division:
Meeting: 2025 IADR/PER General Session & Exhibition (Barcelona, Spain)
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Year: 2025
Final Presentation ID: 1488
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 5: Biocompatibility, Bioengineering and Biologic Effects of Materials
Authors
  • Aybek, Ezgi  ( Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey )
  • Uygunoz, Buse  ( Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey )
  • Ergin, Esra  ( Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey ;  Hacettepe University dentistry , Ankara , Turkey )
  • Yalcin Cakir, Filiz  ( Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey )
  • Yazici, Ayse Ruya  ( Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey ;  Hacettepe University dentistry , Ankara , Turkey )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials 5: Biocompatibility, Bioengineering and Biologic Effects of Materials IV
    Friday, 06/27/2025 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM