IADR Abstract Archives

Photoinactivation of Candida Albicans Using Dual-Wavelength LEDs: Oral Mucositis Implications

Objectives: This study investigates the antimicrobial efficacy of dual-wavelength LED light therapy (460nm+845nm) against C. albicans, aiming to develop an alternative therapeutic approach for managing fungal infections in oral mucositis patients.
Methods: A custom-built LED device combining blue and near-infrared wavelengths (460nm+845nm) was used to treat C. albicans cultures. Samples were exposed to LED light for 2, 5, and 10 minutes, with unexposed samples as controls. The antimicrobial effects were evaluated using multiple parameters: colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MTT metabolic assay, cell viability assessment, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement. Furthermore, a 72-hr old C. albicans biofilm was stained with acridine orange and ethidium bromide and excited with appropriate laser wavelengths to assess its viability using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using the One-Way ANOVA non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis) (n=15 per group).
Results: Dual-wavelength LED exposure demonstrated significant dose-dependent antimicrobial effects against C. albicans. The 10-minute exposure resulted in (1) 82.55% reduction in CFU counts (172 to 30, p<<0.001**), (2) 53.80% decrease in metabolic activity via MTT assay (0.557 to 0.2887, p<0.001*), and (3) 53.80% reduction in cell viability (100 to 46.31, p<0.001**) compared to controls. Mechanistic analyses revealed a 21.93% increase in intracellular ROS levels (p<0.001*). CLSM analysis revealed significant differences in cell viability among various groups of LED-treated C. albicans biofilm, indicating cellular damage. With increasing exposure duration, progressive antimicrobial effects were observed, demonstrating a clear dose-dependent relationship.
Conclusions: Dual-wavelength LED therapy reduces C. albicans viability through enhanced oxidative stress and cellular damage mechanisms. This non-invasive approach shows promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for managing fungal infections in oral mucositis patients. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment parameters and conducting clinical trials to validate its therapeutic efficacy.
Division:
Meeting: 2025 IADR/PER General Session & Exhibition (Barcelona, Spain)
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Year: 2025
Final Presentation ID: 0501
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Lasers & Bio-photonics Group
Authors
  • Joseph, Betsy  ( University of Helsinki, Finland , Helsinki , Finland ;  Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India , Chennai , India )
  • Thomas, Julie  ( University of Helsinki, Finland , Helsinki , Finland ;  Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India , Chennai , India )
  • Mouli, Surej  ( Aston University , Birmingham , United Kingdom )
  • Mauramo, Matti  ( University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland )
  • Sorsa, Timo  ( University of Helsinki, Finland , Helsinki , Finland ;  Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden )
  • Sukumaran, Anil  ( Hamad Medical Corporation , Doha , Qatar ;  Qatar University , Doha , Qatar )
  • Waltimo, Tuomas  ( University of Helsinki, Finland , Helsinki , Finland ;  University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Laser Dentistry
    Thursday, 06/26/2025 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Table 1: Antimicrobial effect of dual-wavelength LED at 2 mins, 5 mins, and 10 mins (n=15).
    C. albicansNo. of colony counted
    (median, min-max)
    CFU/mlMTT absorbanceViability (%)ROS intensity (AU) 
    Control17286000.557100414 
    2 mins129
    (124-134)
    6450
    (6200-6700)
    0.471
    (0.443-0.529)
    84.6
    (79.5-95.0)
    440
    (438-443)
     
    5 mins43
    (39-45)
    2150
    (1950-2250)
    0.380
    (0.371-0.418)
    68.2
    (66.6-75.1)
    442
    (440-445)
     
    10 mins30
    (28-32)
    1500
    (1400-1600)
    0.257
    (0.233-0.278)
    46.2
    (41.8-49.8)
    505
    (503-506)
     
    Change (%) from control to 10 mins82.55%82.55%53.80%53.80%21.89% 
    p-value*<0.001**<0.001**<0.001**<0.001**<0.001** 
    *One-Way ANOVA Non-parametric (Kruskal-Wallis), **highly significant
    IMAGES