IADR Abstract Archives

Bonding to Zirconia: Relative Importance of MDP Adhesives and Sandblasting

Objectives: Bonding to crystalline ceramics is challenging because they cannot be etched. Air-particle-abrasion is commonly used for surface treatment of zirconia to increase micromechanical retention. Use of 10-MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl) primers also improves bonding to zirconia. Purpose: to investigate the influences of 10-MDP containing adhesives and air-particle-abrasion on the shear bond strength to translucent zirconia.
Methods: Translucent zirconia specimens were milled from 18 mm discs of Katana STML (Kuraray Noritake, Japan) and sintered (Zircom, KDF US Inc) per manufacturer’s instructions. Two surface treatments were used: wet-polished to 2000 grit SiC paper, or air-particle-abraded with 50-micron alumina particles at 1.27 cm, 0.2 MPa, 20 seconds. Four 10-MDP containing adhesives (Table 1) were used for each surface treatment. Controls included a non-10-MDP adhesive, and an etched silanated Empress CAD with the same adhesive. After adhesive application, a dual cure resin cement Duo-Link Universal (Bisco, IL) was injected into a 2.2 mm diameter plastic tube and light-cured (Valo X, Ultradent) for 60 seconds. Shear bond strengths were tested after one hour of storage in distilled room-temperature water in a standardized notched fixture (Ultradent Products Inc) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a Universal testing machine (Instron, MA)
Results: Shear bond strengths are reported in Table 1. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among adhesives (p<0.001); Tukey’s testing revealed no differences among 10-MDP containing materials, which were superior to 2 non-10-MDP containing controls, but markedly inferior to one of the same controls when bonded to an etched glass-ceramic (p<0.05). Two-way ANOVA determined that the effect of sandblasting was highly significant (p<0.0001) and accounted for almost all of the experimental variation (mean square=1590); whereas, the type of 10-MDP adhesive was not significant (p=0.2) and had little importance (mean square=7).
Conclusions: 10-MDP containing adhesives were more effective than a non-10-MDP control adhesive, but the effect of air-abrasion was of overwhelming importance.
Division:
Meeting: 2025 IADR/PER General Session & Exhibition (Barcelona, Spain)
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Year: 2025
Final Presentation ID: 2539
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 4: Adhesion
Authors
  • Maharishi, Anvita  ( University of Iowa , Iowa City , Iowa , United States )
  • Mclaren, Edward  ( Private Practice , Park City , Utah , United States )
  • White, Shane  ( University of California - Los Angeles , Los Angeles , California , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Dental Materials 4: Techniques and Materials in Adhesive Dentistry
    Saturday, 06/28/2025 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Four 10-MDP containing adhesives and a non-10-MDP containing adhesive with or without sandblasting were tested for shear bond strength on a zirconia substrate (Katana STML). Groups=10, n=8
    AdhesiveManufacturer of adhesiveContains 10-MDPSandblasted (air-particle abrasion with alumina) or notSBS, MPa (mean, sd)Failure mode
    Scotchbond Universal plus3MYesYes18.8 (1.9)Adhesive
    Scotchbond Universal plus3MYesNo8.7 (1.9)Adhesive
    Clearfil ceramic primer plusKuraray NoritakeYesYes17.3 (3.4)Adhesive
    Clearfil ceramic primer plusKuraray NoritakeYesNo7.1 (1.1)Adhesive
    Z-prime plusBiscoYesYes19.0 (3.5)Adhesive
    Z-prime plusBiscoYesNo8.8 (1.6)Adhesive
    Monobond plusIvoclar VivadentYesYes17.0 (2.0)Adhesive
    Monobond plusIvoclar VivadentYesNo7.2 (1.2)Adhesive
    All-Bond 3 to zirconia substrateBiscoNoYes7.6 (3.5)Adhesive
    All-Bond 3 to etched Empress CAD substrateBiscoNo9.5 % Hydrofluoric acid gel + Bis-silane (Bisco)35.7 (3.1)Cohesive
    SBS - Shear bond strength, Empress CAD - Ivoclar Vivadent