Bonding to Zirconia: Relative Importance of MDP Adhesives and Sandblasting
Objectives: Bonding to crystalline ceramics is challenging because they cannot be etched. Air-particle-abrasion is commonly used for surface treatment of zirconia to increase micromechanical retention. Use of 10-MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl) primers also improves bonding to zirconia. Purpose: to investigate the influences of 10-MDP containing adhesives and air-particle-abrasion on the shear bond strength to translucent zirconia. Methods: Translucent zirconia specimens were milled from 18 mm discs of Katana STML (Kuraray Noritake, Japan) and sintered (Zircom, KDF US Inc) per manufacturer’s instructions. Two surface treatments were used: wet-polished to 2000 grit SiC paper, or air-particle-abraded with 50-micron alumina particles at 1.27 cm, 0.2 MPa, 20 seconds. Four 10-MDP containing adhesives (Table 1) were used for each surface treatment. Controls included a non-10-MDP adhesive, and an etched silanated Empress CAD with the same adhesive. After adhesive application, a dual cure resin cement Duo-Link Universal (Bisco, IL) was injected into a 2.2 mm diameter plastic tube and light-cured (Valo X, Ultradent) for 60 seconds. Shear bond strengths were tested after one hour of storage in distilled room-temperature water in a standardized notched fixture (Ultradent Products Inc) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a Universal testing machine (Instron, MA) Results: Shear bond strengths are reported in Table 1. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among adhesives (p<0.001); Tukey’s testing revealed no differences among 10-MDP containing materials, which were superior to 2 non-10-MDP containing controls, but markedly inferior to one of the same controls when bonded to an etched glass-ceramic (p<0.05). Two-way ANOVA determined that the effect of sandblasting was highly significant (p<0.0001) and accounted for almost all of the experimental variation (mean square=1590); whereas, the type of 10-MDP adhesive was not significant (p=0.2) and had little importance (mean square=7). Conclusions: 10-MDP containing adhesives were more effective than a non-10-MDP control adhesive, but the effect of air-abrasion was of overwhelming importance.
Maharishi, Anvita
( University of Iowa
, Iowa City
, Iowa
, United States
)
Mclaren, Edward
( Private Practice
, Park City
, Utah
, United States
)
White, Shane
( University of California - Los Angeles
, Los Angeles
, California
, United States
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Dental Materials 4: Techniques and Materials in Adhesive Dentistry
Saturday,
06/28/2025
, 11:00AM - 12:15PM
TABLES
Four 10-MDP containing adhesives and a non-10-MDP containing adhesive with or without sandblasting were tested for shear bond strength on a zirconia substrate (Katana STML). Groups=10, n=8
Adhesive
Manufacturer of adhesive
Contains 10-MDP
Sandblasted (air-particle abrasion with alumina) or not
SBS, MPa (mean, sd)
Failure mode
Scotchbond Universal plus
3M
Yes
Yes
18.8 (1.9)
Adhesive
Scotchbond Universal plus
3M
Yes
No
8.7 (1.9)
Adhesive
Clearfil ceramic primer plus
Kuraray Noritake
Yes
Yes
17.3 (3.4)
Adhesive
Clearfil ceramic primer plus
Kuraray Noritake
Yes
No
7.1 (1.1)
Adhesive
Z-prime plus
Bisco
Yes
Yes
19.0 (3.5)
Adhesive
Z-prime plus
Bisco
Yes
No
8.8 (1.6)
Adhesive
Monobond plus
Ivoclar Vivadent
Yes
Yes
17.0 (2.0)
Adhesive
Monobond plus
Ivoclar Vivadent
Yes
No
7.2 (1.2)
Adhesive
All-Bond 3 to zirconia substrate
Bisco
No
Yes
7.6 (3.5)
Adhesive
All-Bond 3 to etched Empress CAD substrate
Bisco
No
9.5 % Hydrofluoric acid gel + Bis-silane (Bisco)
35.7 (3.1)
Cohesive
SBS - Shear bond strength, Empress CAD - Ivoclar Vivadent