IADR Abstract Archives

Effect of Specimen Storage Solution on Properties of Polymer-Based Materials

Objectives: To compare calcium release, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and shear bond strength of commercial products across four specimen storage solutions.
Methods: Flexural strength and flexural modulus were tested with BISCO Duo-Link Universal (DLU) self-cured into 2 mm x 2 mm x 20 mm beams following ISO 4049, broken after 24 hours in solution. Shear bond strength to sandblasted stainless steel was tested with DLU and BISCO All-Bond Universal (ABU) following ABU’s self-etching technique, broken after 24 hours in solution. Cumulative calcium release was tested with BISCO TheraCal LC (TCLC) light-cured into disks of 20 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness, with release tested after 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days in solution. Each test method was conducted with specimens that had been immersed at 37 °C in one of four storage solutions – deionized water (DI), simulated body fluid formulated following ISO 23317 (SBF), ThermoFisher phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and Pickering Laboratories 1700-0305 artificial saliva (AS).
Results: For each test, differences between the four storage solutions were statistically analyzed (ANOVA, Tukey, p<0.05). Flexural strength, flexural modulus, and shear-bond strength to stainless steel showed no statistically significant differences between any storage solution groups. For calcium release, all four storage solution groups were statistically significantly different with progressively higher results for AS, PBS, DI, and SBF.
Conclusions: No differences were detected between the four storage solutions for flexural strength, flexural modulus, or shear-bond strength to stainless steel. However, there were significant differences in calcium release between all four storage solutions.
Division:
Meeting: 2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024
Final Presentation ID: 0479
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Sedlacek, Timothy  ( BISCO , Schaumburg , Illinois , United States )
  • Gianacakos, Carter  ( BISCO , Schaumburg , Illinois , United States )
  • Yu, Erick  ( BISCO , Schaumburg , Illinois , United States )
  • Suh, Byoung  ( BISCO , Schaumburg , Illinois , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: All authors of this study are employees of BISCO, which owns some of the materials used.
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Mechanical Properties II
    Thursday, 03/14/2024 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    TABLES
    Test results of DLU, ABU, and TCLC across four storage solutions
    Test MethodSBFDIPBSAS
    Flexural Strength (MPa)103.5 ± 9.1 A109.7 ± 12.6 A105.0 ± 15.4 A103.1 ± 11.8 A
    Flexural Modulus (GPa)5.51 ± 0.15 A5.36 ± 0.08 A5.69 ± 0.20 A5.27 ± 0.61 A
    Shear Bond Strength (MPa)42.62 ± 5.30 A41.91 ± 5.95 A42.64 ± 4.00 A46.06 ± 1.83 A
    Cum. Calcium Release (μg/mm3)1833 ± 162 A676 ± 35.2 B18.6 ± 3.9 C1.51 ± 0.26 D
    *Uppercase letters: statistically significant differences between storage solutions for a given test method