Correlation Between Translucency and Light Irradiance Through Clear PVS Materials
Objectives: Clear PVS materials can be used as a matrix through which composite is cured. This study evaluated the correlation between the translucency and light irradiance through clear PVS materials. Methods: Specimens (n=5) of 4 clear PVS materials (see tables) were dispensed into Teflon molds (diameter=12mm) of 5 different thicknesses (2mm, 4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm). Specimens were placed against calibrated white and black backgrounds and L*a*b* values were taken using a spectrophotometer (CM-700d; Konica Minolta). The translucency parameter was measured as the difference in color using ΔE00. For light irradiance, each PVS specimen was placed onto a spectrophotometer‘s sensor (MARC Light Collector, BlueLight Analytics) to measure irradiance transmitted through the specimens from a light curing unit (Valo Cord, Ultradent, irradiance=1100mW/cm2). All specimens were light-exposed in the Standard mode for 5s (V100045, Valo Corded, Ultradent). The irradiance (mW/cm2) was calculated by dividing the power (mW) by the 10mm diameter of the integrating sphere aperture (A=0.785cm2). Translucency and light irradiance were analyzed separately through two-way ANOVA (factors: brand and thickness) and Tukey post-hoc run where appropriate. Correlation between translucency and light irradiance of materials for each thickness was evaluated with Pearsons coefficient using SPSS. Results: The mean ± standard deviation of the translucency and light irradiance are presented (see tables). Two-way ANOVA was significant for both factors and their interaction (p<.01), so individual one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc performed; significant differences are indicated with lowercase letters in each row and uppercase letters in each column. Materials were significantly less translucent and allowed less curing light irradiance as they increased in thickness. There was a strong correlation between the translucency and light irradiance of different materials at each thickness (r=.893) Conclusions: When curing composite through clear PVS materials, light irradiance is influenced by the PVS thickness and brand and correlated with its translucency.
2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana) New Orleans, Louisiana
2024 1892 Dental Materials 7: Color and Appearance (Esthetics)
Machado, Nadia
( UAB School of Dentistry
, Birmingham
, Alabama
, United States
)
Rocha, Mateus
( University of Florida
, Gainesville
, Florida
, United States
)
Robles, Augusto
( University of Alabama at Birmingham
, Birmingham
, Alabama
, United States
)
Martins, Emerson
( University of Alabama at Birmingham
, Birmingham
, Alabama
, United States
)
Lawson, Nathaniel
( UAB School of Dentistry
, Birmingham
, Alabama
, United States
)
Rojas, Melody
( University of Florida
, Gainesville
, Florida
, United States
)
All materials other than Clear Bite were donated by their companies
Dr. Lawson has received grants and honorarium from GC and Clinicians Choice. He has received grants from Kulzer.
Poster Session
Color & Appearance (Esthetics) II
Friday,
03/15/2024
, 03:45PM - 05:00PM
Light transmission (mW/cm2)
2mm
4mm
6mm
8mm
10mm
Affinity Crystal (Clinician
747.2 +/-27.33aB
605.2 +/-10.99bBC
479.4 +/-16.95cB
424 +/-13.93dC
422.8 +/-28.37dC
Clear Bite Matrix (DenMat)
749 +/-28.12aB
628 +/-16.91bB
509 +/-12.92cB
473.2 +/-12.76dB
369 +/-18.34eB
Exaclear (GC)
904.4 +/-6.15aA
845.2 +/-8.87bA
754 +/-15.67cA
762.6 +/-8.26cA
700 +/-4.06dA
Memosil 2 (Kulzer)
760 +/-18.88aB
571.8 +/-29.79bC
484.4 +/-25.33cB
422.8 +/-28.37dC
334 +/-7.04eC
significant differences are indicated with lowercase letters in each row and uppercase letters in each column
Translucency (TP)
2mm
4mm
6mm
8mm
10mm
Affinity Crystal (Clinician
52.97 +/-2.49aB
37.63 +/-1.02bC
29.43 +/-2.01cB
20.37 +/-3.63dB
18.45 +/-1.8eB
Clear Bite Matrix (DenMat)
55.4 +/-2.98aB
40.82 +/-1.07bB
32.01 +/-3.89cB
20.55 +/-0.93dB
18.79 +/-1.29dB
Exaclear (GC)
67.03 +/-2.34aA
51.38 +/-2.01bA
44.57 +/-3.97cA
34.43 +/-2.67dA
28.61 +/-4.4eA
Memosil 2 (Kulzer)
50.63 +/-2.16aB
28.13 +/-1.79bD
19.16 +/-1.25cC
12.01 +/-1.48dC
9.01 +/-0.99eC
significant differences are indicated with lowercase letters in each row and uppercase letters in each column