Printing Orientation Effects on Mechanical Properties of a 3D-Printed Composite.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of printing-orientation (45° or 90°) and storage time (24hours or 8months) on flexural strength and microhardness of a composite-resin processed via 3D-printing. Methods: 80 specimens of methacrylate-based composite-resin with zirconia filler particles (BioCrown, MakertechLabs) were produced in disc-shaped format (12x1mm) using a 3D-printer with Digital Light Processing technology (FlashForgeHunter, Flashforge) and following manufacturer's recommendations. Specimens were divided into two groups based on printing angle (45° or 90°). Half of the specimens in each group (n=20) were stored in an incubator (dry, 37°C, 24hours) while the other half was stored for 8months in same ambient condition. After storage periods, 10 discs from each group were tested in a biaxial flexural strength setup (piston-on-three-balls, 0.5mm/min). The remaining 10 specimens from each group were embedded in a plastic tube with acrylic resin and polished with sandpaper (grit 420, 600, 800, 1200, 1500 and 4000). Their Knoop microhardness was measured in a microhardness tester (50Kgf, 15s). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way-ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). Results: Both printing-orientation and storage time significantly affected flexural strength of tested composite. Considering the same storage time, specimens printed at 90° resulted in significantly higher mean strength compared to those printed at 45°. Regardless of the printing-angle, groups stored for 8months exhibited significantly lower strength (approximately 25% decrease) compared to those measured for specimens stored for 24hours. As for Knoop microhardness, neither printing-angle nor storage time had any effect on mean values obtained for different experimental groups. Conclusions: The angle orientation used for 3D-printing affected flexural strength of the studied composite. Specimens printed at 90° showed significantly higher flexural strength. However, no impact of the printing-orientation was observed on microhardness of composite. Storage for 8months significantly reduced flexural strength of the studied material compared to control group, nonetheless, its hardness remained unaffected by storage time.
Division: Meeting:2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana) Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024 Final Presentation ID:2385 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
Silveira Savo, Isabella
( University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
, São Paulo
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Laurino, Fernando Antonio
( University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
, São Paulo
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Romano, Marcelo
( University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Hagy, Marcos
( University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Cesar, Paulo
( University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry
, São Paulo
, São Paulo
, Brazil
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Materials for 3D Printing I
Saturday,
03/16/2024
, 11:00AM - 12:15PM
TABLES
Flexural Strength and Microhardness of a 3D-printed composite as a function of printing-orientation and storage time.
Printing Orientation (°)
Storage Time
Flexural Strength (MPa)
SD (MPa)
CV (%)
Knoop Microhardness (kgf/mm2)
SD (kgf/mm2)
CV (%)
45
24h
128.8b
4.4
3
18.1a
3.7
20
8months
100.8d
7.3
7
19.2a
1.8
9
90
24h
159.4a
4.4
3
18.1a
2.0
10
9months
112.8c
9.7
9
18.3a
1.2
6
Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference among groups, at an alpha confidence level of 0.05%.