IADR Abstract Archives

Gallium Release From Experimental Dental Composites Containing Gallium-Doped Bioactive Glass

Objectives: To test the gallium release from experimental antibacterial dental composites containing gallium-doped bioactive glass and antibacterial monomers.
Methods: Method: The Ga-bioglass (Na2O-SiO2-CaO-P2O5-Ga2O3) was synthesized using a sol-gel method. The control composite was formulated with 29% commercial dental monomers (BisGMA:EBPAGMA:HDDMA = 4:4:2), 1% photoinitiators, and 70% commercial F-releasing glass filler (SCHOTT AG, Germany). Experimental composites were formulated by replacing part of the filler contents in the control with 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30% Ga-bioglass, and 5% synthesized antimicrobial monomers C16DC2 or DD11 (compositions shown in Table 1). The disc specimens of the composites (10.5 mm dia., 2.1 mm thick, n=5) were light-cured, polished, and immersed in 5 mL of acetate buffer (pH=5.5) and DI water (pH=7.0), respectively. The solutions were withdrawn every day and replaced by fresh solutions. Each sample solution was mixed (1:1) with an acetate buffer (pH=4) containing 5 mM hexadecylpyridinium chloride and 1 mM carminic acid, let stand for 2h, and tested for gallium concentration using a Lambda 35 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer). The standard calibration curve was made by a serial gallium nitrate standard solutions (10-6M-10-4M) under the same conditions. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (a=0.05).
Results: As shown in Table 1, gallum release increased with Ga-bioglass content, higher release at pH7 than pH5.5, and increased by additional antimicrobial monomers.
Conclusions: Dental composites containing gallium-doped bioactive glass can release significant amount of gallium and thus have antibacterial activity.
Division:
Meeting: 2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024
Final Presentation ID: 1940
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Foster, Trinity  ( Louisiana State University Health-New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Boeneke, Landon  ( Louisiana State University Health-New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Wang, Yapin  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Public Health , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Yu, Qingzhao  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Public Health , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Xu, Xiaoming  ( Louisiana State University Health-New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: NIH/NIDCR grant # R01DE026782
    Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    New Material Chemistry I
    Friday, 03/15/2024 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    Table 1. Cumulative gallium release in 30 days (mean±SD, n=5).
    CompositesGallium release (μg/cm2)
    pH=5.5
    Gallium release (μg/cm2)
    pH=7.0
    Control24.14±4.04c19.30±2.38E
    Exp1 10%Ga-bioglass 23.37±3.94c23.74±6.23E
    Exp2 15%Ga-bioglass 28.99±2.99c31.30±9.07DE
    Exp3 20%Ga-bioglass 30.77±3.21c43.94±13.19D
    Exp4 25%Ga-bioglass 58.01±1.76a153.84±7.77B
    Exp5 30%Ga-bioglass 55.81±3.43a202.56±7.92A
    Expt6 20%Ga-bioglass+5%DD11 45.34±5.61b129.77±11.75C
    Expt7 20%Ga-bioglass+5%C16C2
    42.41±5.12b114.49±12.00C
    The groups with the different superscript letters have significant differences (p<0.05).