IADR Abstract Archives

Mechanical Properties of Antibacterial Dental Composites Containing Gallium-Doped Bioactive Glass

Objectives: To study the mechanical properties of antibacterial dental composites containing gallium-doped bioactive glass (Ga-bioglass).
Methods: The Ga-bioglass (Na2O-SiO2-CaO-P2O5-Ga2O3) was synthesized using a sol-gel method, calcinated at about 700°C, ground and sieved to fine powder (mean ~3.4µm). SEM/EDS analysis showed that the Ga-bioglass contains 15.5% Ga2O3. The control composite was formulated with 29% commercial dental monomers (BisGMA:EBPAGMA:HDDMA = 4:4:2), 1% photoinitiators, and 70% commercial UltraFine F-releasing glass filler (SCHOTT AG, Germany). Experimental composites were formulated by replacing part of the filler contents in the control with 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30% Ga-bioglass. Additional 5% synthesized antimicrobial monomers C16DC2 or DD11, or 3% gallium-chelate monomer were added to the 20%Ga-bioglass composite (composition shown in Table 1). The composite specimens (2×2×25mm, n=12) were prepared by light-cure tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus on Instron 5566 after 24h storage in de-ionized water at 37oC. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (a=0.05).
Results: Table 1 shows the flexural strength and flexural modulus of experimental antibacterial dental composites.
Conclusions: The experimental composite containing up to 20% Ga-bioglass and 5% DD11 have similar mechanical properties to the control. Further increase of the amount of Ga-bioglass filler or adding 5% antimicrobial monomer C16DC2 or 3% Ga-chelate monomer will significantly decrease the mechanical properties.
Division:
Meeting: 2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024
Final Presentation ID: 0974
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
Authors
  • Boeneke, Landon  ( Louisiana State University Health-New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Foster, Trinity  ( Louisiana State University Health-New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Wang, Yapin  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Mon, Htwe  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Yu, Qingzhao  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Public Health , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Xu, Xiaoming  ( Louisiana State University Health- New Orleans School of Dentistry , New Orleans , Louisiana , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: NIH/NIDCR grant # R01DE026782
    Financial Interest Disclosure: None
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Antimicrobial Materials
    Thursday, 03/14/2024 , 03:45PM - 05:00PM
    TABLES
    Table 1. Mechanical properties of experimental antibacterial dental composites.
    MaterialsFlexure strength 24Hrs (MPa)
    (mean±SD, n=12)
    Flexure Modulus 24Hrs (GPa)
    (mean±SD, n=12)
    Control109.98±15.09AB9.50±0.63abc
    Exp1 10%Ga-bioglass117.72±13.54A9.97±0.84ab
    Exp2 15%Ga-bioglass112.36±13.74A9.70±1.07ab
    Exp3 20%Ga-bioglass104.05±14.3AB10.11±0.60a
    Exp4 25%Ga-bioglass84.31±6.94CD9.13±0.69bcd
    Exp5 30%Ga-bioglass79.15±5.26CD8.52±0.91cd
    Exp6 20% Ga-bioglass+5%DD1192.97±6.25BC8.63±0.69cd
    Exp7 20%Ga-bioglass+5%C16DC275.70±8.67CD8.27±0.70d
    Exp8 20%Ga-bioglass+5%C16DC2+3%Ga-Chelate71.73±9.42D7.14±0.64e
    The groups with different superscript letters have significant difference (p<0.05).