Assessing Strength of Bioactive and Orthodontic Adhesives After Aging Challenges
Objectives: A bioactive material, presumably advantageous for orthodontic application, showed good bracket bond strengths. Since cohesive strength also affects debonding behavior, diametral tensile strengths after aging and acid challenge were determined and compared to conventional resin-base and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives Methods: Cylindrical samples for diametral tensile testing (5mm diameter, 3.5mm length) were made with a bioactive (Activa Bioactive), conventional (Transbond XT), and glass ionomer (GlassLok) orthodontic adhesive. Samples were light cured for 20s from both sides with Valo curing light. The bioactive and glass ionomer materials were kept at 37°C for 10 minutes before demolding to ensure setting. Samples were stored in water at 37°C for 24h, thermocycled 5/55°C for 5,000 cycles, or thermocycled followed by three weeks in lactic acid gel (pH 5.1) before testing (N=10/group). The diametral tensile tests were carried out at 0.5mm/min crosshead speed. Tensile strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons (significance level 0.05) and correlated with existing bracket bond strengths determined using the same experimental protocol. Results: Diametral tensile strengths are shown in the table. Two-way ANOVA indicated that material, test condition, and material*test condition interaction significantly affected the diametral tensile strengths (p=0.0001, p=0.0146, and p=0.0135). The strength of the bioactive material was about 25% lower than the conventional adhesive, but was 3-times higher than the glass ionomer. Aging through thermocycling alone did not significantly decrease the tensile strength unless in combination with the acid challenge in the conventional and bioactive adhesives. Correlation coefficient between diametral tensile strengths and bond strengths was 0.67. Conclusions: The diametral tensile strength of the bioactive adhesive was generally lower than the conventional adhesive and showed a positive correlation with bracket bond strengths. Unlike the conventional adhesive, the acidic environment did not significantly reduce tensile strength of the bioactive or glass ionomer materials compared to the initial values.
Division: Meeting:2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana) Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024 Final Presentation ID:0758 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):SCADA
Authors
Mckay, James
( University of Tennessee Health Science Center
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Swearingen, Kyla
( University of Tennessee Health Science Center
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Tantbirojn, Daranee
( University of Tennessee Health Science Center
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Versluis, Antheunis
( University of Tennessee Health Science Center
, Memphis
, Tennessee
, United States
)
Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Supported by the UTHSC College of Dentistry Alumni Endowment Fund and the Tennessee Dental Association Foundation. We thank Mr Brian Morrow for his assistance with the thermocycling
Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
SCADA: Basic and Translational Science Research
Thursday,
03/14/2024
, 11:00AM - 12:15PM
TABLES
Diametral tensile strengths (mean ± standard deviation; MPa) for three orthodontic adhesives at three aging stages.
Orthodontic adhesive
24-hours
Thermocycled
Thermocycled + Acid Challenged
Conventional
48.47 ± 3.40 A
45.39 ± 5.13 AB
42.65 ± 5.65 B
Bioactive
36.15 ± 7.38 CD
40.01 ± 2.88 BC
33.04 ± 6.12 D
Glass Ionomer
11.49 ± 1.67 E
16.04 ± 4.45 E
14.56 ± 3.57 E
Same letters indicate groups that are not significant different (two-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons; significance level 0.05).