IADR Abstract Archives

Resin Cement Color Stability After Accelerated Artificial Aging

Objectives: This investigation had two objectives:1- to evaluate the intrinsic color stability of four resin cements after water storage and exposure to an artificial sunlight source and 2- to evaluate the color changes of a ceramic restorative material following placement of the resin cements on the intaglio surface of the ceramic.
Methods: Cylindrical bulk cement specimens (n=8) of G-CEM one (G), Rely-X Universal (R), Panavia V5 (P) and Variolink Esthetic (V) were made measuring 8mm in diameter and 3mm in depth in a custom mold, visible light cured for 40 seconds and polished to a highly glossy surface using the Sof-lex system. Ceramic wafers measuring1 ± 0.1 mm were cut from GC Initial LiSi ceramic blocks and one side polished to a 4000 grit surface. After treating the non-polished surface the wafers were placed in a custom mold with a 0.12 mm thick chamber. Each cement was placed in the mold and the ceramic positioned over the cement and ight polymerized for 40 seconds.
After water storage for 24 hours at 37° C baseline color measurements were made with the Vita EasyShade instrument calculating Commission international de l’eclairage L*a*b* (CIELAB) values for each specimen. Each specimen was subjected to 16, four-hour aging cycles using a Xenon light source with an intensity of 0.4 W/m2. 8 specimens of each cement were used a control with no accelerated aging. Delta E was measured at baseline, after 7 days and after 28 days with the differences calculated from the CIELAB detla E values measured at baseline. Two-way ANOVA (cement and measurement period) and post-hoc LSD test was used for determining differences among the cements.
Results: The results for the bulk cement specimens are shown in Table 1 and for the ceramic specimens in Table 2. A change greater than 3 delta E units is considered to be the threshold of humans detecting color changes. All the P,G,and V all demonstrated changes from baseline below this level for the bulk and ceramic specimens. R generated higher delta E values than 3 for the bullk specimens and significantly greater color change compared to the other cements (p<0.05) for both bulk and ceramic groups.
Conclusions: There were significant differences in the measured delta E values for the cements exposed to accelerated aging based on the cement and measurement time.

2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana)
New Orleans, Louisiana
2024
1426
Dental Materials 2: Polymer-based Materials
  • Latta, Mark  ( Creighton University , Omaha , Nebraska , United States )
  • Samuels, Alvin  ( Creighton University , Omaha , Nebraska , United States )
  • Radniecki, Scott  ( Creighton University , Omaha , Nebraska , United States )
  • GC international AG
    The work was supported by a grant from GC International AG. None of the authors have a financial interest in the materials used in this study
    Poster Session
    Mechanical Properties III
    Friday, 03/15/2024 , 11:00AM - 12:15PM
    Table 1. Bulk Cement delta E changes
    Cementdelta E after 7 daysdelta E after 28 days
    P1.38 ± 0.53 A,a1.66 ± 0.59 A,a
    G1.77 ± 0.56 A,a1.87 ± 0.56 A,a
    V2.01 ± 0.67 A,a2.18 ± 0.84 A,a
    R4.49 ± 1.01 B,a5.56 ± 0.97 B,b
    Groups connected by a similar capital letter in a column were statistically similar (p>0.05). A different small letter across a row signified a statistical difference (p<0.05) for a given cement between he 7 and 28 day measurement periods.
    Table 2. Differences in delta E for ceramic specimens
    Cementdelta E after 7 daysdelta E after 28 days
    P0.97 ± 0.24 A,a0.93 ± 0.16 A,a
    G0.95 ± 0.17 A,a1.07 ± 0.34 A,a
    V0.93 ± 0.25 A,a1.00 ± 0.22 A,a
    R1.67 ± 0.40 B,a2.17 ± 0.42 B,b
    Groups connected by a similar capital letter in a column were statistically similar (p>0.05). A different small letter across a row signified a statistical difference (p<0.05) for a given cement between he 7 and 28 day measurement periods.