Masking White-Spot-Lesions Color Using Resin-Infiltration, Self-Assembling Peptide, CPP-ACPF.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare three treatments; Resin-Infiltrate (Icon®), Self-Assembling-Peptide (CurodontTM Repair-Fluoride-Plus), and CPP-ACPF technology (MI Paste-One®), for their ability to improve light reflectivity and mask the color of white spot lesions (WSLs) using spectrophotometric analysis. Methods: 3x4mm treatment-windows were created by polishing the cervical 1/3 of the facial surface of 45 extracted human anterior and premolars. To induce artificial WSLs, treatment-windows were exposed to Quiroz-demineralization-solution for 72 hours. Specimens randomly allocated to 3 treatment-groups: ICON, Curodont, and MI (n=15). Treatments applied following manufacturers’ instructions. Groups underwent a pH-cycle challenge (4-hours demineralization, 20-remineralization) for 27 days. MI received phosphoric-acid etching twice and was applied daily. Spectrophotometer (VITA Easy Shade Compact) used to quantitatively measure enamel-lightness values (L*) of each sample at 4-time points; baseline (T0), after WSL creation (T1), immediately post-treatment (T2), and post pH-cycle (T3). Lightness-change (ΔL*) was analyzed using Tukey’s test. Results: Within each group, repeated-measure-ANOVA showed statistically significant decrease in L* from T0 to T1, along with a chalky-white visual-appearance of the specimens, meeting the pre-defined criteria for successful WSL creation. Using Tukey’s test for between-groups comparison demonstrated that immediate application (T2) of Icon resulted in the lowest ΔL values (T1-T2), significantly differing from Curodont and MI Paste. After pH challenge, Icon and Curodont experienced significant drop in L* mean-value compared to T2. MI exhibited the least ΔL values at T3, while Curodont experienced a significant drop. Conclusions: Within the study limitations, Curodont Repair-Fluoride-Plus, MI paste-One, and Icon treatments could not restore enamel lightness and translucency following the pH cycle. Icon provided significant improvement in lightness immediately after treatment; however, failed to maintain the improved L values following the pH challenge. Curodont did not induce significant change in L values after treatment and was significantly impacted by the pH challenge.
Division: Meeting:2024 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session (New Orleans, Louisiana) Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Year: 2024 Final Presentation ID:1856 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Cariology Research-Demineralization/Remineralization
Authors
Nguyen, Leslie
( Texas A&M School of Dentistry
, Dallas
, Texas
, United States
)
Gogineni, Yasaswi
( Texas A&M School of Dentistry
, Dallas
, Texas
, United States
; Texas A&M College
, College Station
, Texas
, United States
)
Obeidat, Raghad
( Texas A&M School of Dentistry
, Dallas
, Texas
, United States
)
Noureldin, Amal
( Texas A&M School of Dentistry
, Dallas
, Texas
, United States
)
Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: Baylor Oral Health Foundation
Financial Interest Disclosure: None
SESSION INFORMATION
Poster Session
Demineralization/Remineralization II
Friday,
03/15/2024
, 03:45PM - 05:00PM
TABLES
Within group repeated-measure-ANOVA
Time Point
ICON
Curodont
MI Paste
Mean ± SE
Mean ± SE
Mean ± SE
(T0) Baseline
81.550 a 1.480
83.643 a 1.480
81.847 a 1.480
(T1) WSL
71.520 c 1.506
74.947 b 1.506
71.320 c 1.506
(T2) Treatment
80.213 a 1.776
74.113 b 1.776
77.373 b 1.776
(T3) pH Cycle
73.753 b 1.719
65.953 c 1.719
77.387 b 1.719
*Means followed by Different Letters in column are significantly different (p < 0.05)
Tukey’s test for between-groups comparison
Time Point
ΔL (T0-T1) After White spot lesion creation
ΔL (T0-T2) After treatment compared to Baseline
ΔL (T1-T2) After treatment compared to WSL
ΔL (T0-T3) Longevity of color masking after pH cycle
ICON
10.030A
1.337A
-8.693A
7.797B
Curodont
8.697A
9.530C
0.833C
17.69C
MI Paste
10.527A
4.473B
-6.053B
4.460A
*Means followed by Different Letters in column are significantly different (p < 0.05)